Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

just looking to purchase a clinometer, but not sure on which to buy.

Sunnto have 2 different models, pm5/360 and pm5/1520

 

which one is better for tree heights??

 

many thanks for your help

tree

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

The Suunto ones come with a variety of different scales and info on them. One just gives you an angle reading so you have to use a conversion table to find the height. The best one in my experience gives actual readings of the height on scales that depend how far you are stood from the tree. Eg one scale gives heights when you are 20m away, one gives heights when you are 25m away etc. That makes it easy because you just need to accurately pace out a set distance from the tree each time to get an instant height reading.

 

I've got a Haglof digital clinonmeter which is better again as its smaller, lighter and gives you a height that already takes your own height in to consideration.

Posted

When I worked on NG, we had a nice laser that worked it all out for you; didn't really matter where you stood distance-wise. Think it was an impulse laser:confused1:

Posted

If you can afford it, buy the TruPulse; it measures your distance and works out the height of the tree from two angles plus many other attributes - makes life a lot easier.

 

I've also used the Haglof digital clinometer which is great but requires you to measure the distance you're away from the subject tree, as you would need to do with the Suunto.

Posted

I had a go with a good one, from memory I think was called a laser ace.

As others have said buy the best you can afford, really you don't want to be messing about measuring distances and working stuff out in the field if you can help it.

Posted

Andrew the only problem with the tru-pulse is that you have to keep looking through the eyepiece to read off the data whereas with the impulse laser it is on a display at the rear also the impulse is more accurate than the trupulse hence why NG preferred the readings from the impulse for measurements.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.