Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

That is, (if memory serves) an Atlas 3006. I have owned one. Its not strictly speaking a timber crane but it was OK on tree surgery waste.

 

Not a bad crane, this one looks to have had a winch on it.

 

The pipework looks a bit odd, there are only three pipes (you would expect to see 4), its incomplete and I don't see any services on the valve for a grab and rotator. You need to clear that up before you buy.

 

On a 3PL they aren't as stable as on a vehicle. although this is still attached to the chassis of its donor vehicle. The linkages allow a lot of "slop" in use.

Posted

As tree quip says piping look s a bit odd, pies for auxiliaries seem to end at end of first section, so bear in mind your gonna have to spend a fair bit piping it out to end of boom then devise a method for keeping pipes tidy and out of the way

Posted

Mmmm, I spent nearly £600 on pipework to fit a rotator onto my 360 excavator so work back from that. I would think this would be fine for the odd lift.

Stop tractor.

Get out of the cab.

Use crane.

Get back into cab.

Move tractor.

Repeat this process many times.

Bear in mind that you have no controls in your cab so any work will be very slow!

codlasher

Posted (edited)
Mmmm, I spent nearly £600 on pipework to fit a rotator onto my 360 excavator so work back from that. I would think this would be fine for the odd lift.

 

codlasher

 

 

You could have done that for about £250 for an electric changeover valve and some fittings.

 

The hiab looks a complete bodge. They've cut the back of the lorry off (even left the number plate! :lol:) and welded a shoddy 3-pt linkage with very little structural strength. I wouldn't touch it with a bargepole. Soon as you swing a reasonable load out towards the back, sides or front that linkage bracket will part company with the rest of the crane. Previously those jacklegs had twenty foot of lorry chassis and the associated ground footprint via the wheels keeping them vertical. Now they have three inches of crappy welding on some second-hand box section. That thing scares me just looking at it.

 

It's amazing how much people will bid on the strength of a quick paintjob. :001_rolleyes:

Edited by doobin
Posted

I've always thought a back actor back hoe would be a cheap way of lifting wood if you change from bucket to hook.

 

Obvioursly very limited, but horses for courses and its better than manual handling.

 

Obvioursly not fit for the op's situation

Posted

i would expect the international to fall to bits long before the crane. it would be much better if mounted directly on the tractor and as mentioned a larger tractor maybe 6cly for greater stability/visibility

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.