Which saws do you prefer in the woods??

[SawTroll]

Any pics of 6100?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

 

Bulky, heavy and an inboard clutch - no thanks!

 

OK, it depends on what the alternatives are of course, but the 560xp obviously are a much better choise.

[Eddy_t]

Bulky, heavy and an inboard clutch - no thanks!

 

 

 

OK, it depends on what the alternatives are of course, but the 560xp obviously are a much better choise.

 

 

I prefer an inboard clutch, much easier to fit a bar and chain, change sprocket and work on. Don't spout anything about balance, they like to roll onto the side with outboard saws

[TimberCutterDartmoor]

I prefer an inboard clutch, much easier to fit a bar and chain, change sprocket and work on. Don't spout anything about balance, they like to roll onto the side with outboard saws

 

Beat me to it.

 

Troll thinks power to weight is the only prerequisite for a superior saw lol

 

Hey Troll! - RELIABILITY

[Eddy_t]

Beat me to it.

 

 

 

Troll thinks power to weight is the only prerequisite for a superior saw lol

 

 

 

Hey Troll! - RELIABILITY

 

 

I have a 560, it's been pretty reliable so far, I just wish it had an inboard clutch, but that's why I got a 362xp

[Stubby]

For me , as its what I have ! , 346 ported by spud 8 pin 15" and or 560 breathed on by petemate 8 pin 18" .

[TGB]

... they like to roll onto the side with outboard saws

Quicker snedding.

[Eddy_t]

Quicker snedding.

 

 

So why is everyone in the world logging championships using inboard clutch saws?

[Chris Sheppard]

So why is everyone in the world logging championships using inboard clutch saws?

 

fast bar/changes?

 

I reckon for snedding, nothing can touch a 242 for handling.

[Stubby]

fast bar/changes?

 

I reckon for snedding, nothing can touch a 242 for handling.

 

2nd that on the 242

[Brushcutter]

fast bar/changes?

 

I reckon for snedding, nothing can touch a 242 for handling.

 

550 isn't lagging that far behind.