Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted
No it's the idiots that wanted to wear their pelts who are to blame. IMO

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

 

Sorry John, I have to partly disagree...the animal rights yobs should have had enough knowledge to know the devastation they would cause by releasing them.

 

There must have been another way to protest

Posted
Have to agree. Saw mink in the river in Hebden bridge taking ducklings. Did wonders for the population of everything along the Calder

 

agree with you, fish on the calder and canal, in the summer you can one ever 600/800 yards

Posted
No it's the idiots that wanted to wear their pelts who are to blame. IMO

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

 

Yes I agree the idiots who wanted to wear the pelts as well!

Posted
Sorry John, I have to partly disagree...the animal rights yobs should have had enough knowledge to know the devastation they would cause by releasing them.

 

There must have been another way to protest

 

Yep, I can totally see your point, but this is a completely man made problem (by furriers, consumers and A L F), and yes mink are pretty destructive, but they can co exist in smaller numbers, like any predator they are just trying to get on

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Posted

I think as well back when the anti fur movement was in full swing there were so many horrific images of animal cruelty coming out of these fur farms a lot of people reacted without thinking of long term effects, just rather alleviate short term suffering

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Posted

dont agree. there isnt much wrong with wearing fur (only on special crocket nights) - its biodegradeable, renewable and 'humane' if they live a good natural life and quick painless death, its no different to eating them. like that happens anywhere if mankind's doing the harvesting though, that is the injustice. once saw a video of dogs stacked in a pile blinking out of live skinned bodies. i could easily rip a head off someone i saw doing that, in fact just give me an address

Posted
dont agree. there isnt much wrong with wearing fur (only on special crocket nights) - its biodegradeable, renewable and 'humane' if they live a good natural life and quick painless death, its no different to eating them. like that happens anywhere if mankind's doing the harvesting though, that is the injustice. once saw a video of dogs stacked in a pile blinking out of live skinned bodies. i could easily rip a head off someone i saw doing that, in fact just give me an address

 

I think there's a fair bit wrong with wearing the skin of a wild animal for fashion.

 

Daniel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.