Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

yes its going proper thanks its got the that same angry wasp attitude as its little brother but its happiest when its up too its felling dogs in wood:thumbup1::thumbup1::thumbup1:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Mate, there is virtually no difference in weight, and very little in price, so why bother with less power? Just go for the 61, you won't look back!

 

I agree, only reason I went for the 441 over the 461 is because my next saw down is a 261 and next up is a 650

 

All great saws

Posted

Yeh, I get you chris. Then again thinking of it, I wouldn't of bought the 650, just gone straight to 660.

 

Not that it really matters, but was there a reason for getting the 650 and not the 660?

Posted
Yeh, I get you chris. Then again thinking of it, I wouldn't of bought the 650, just gone straight to 660.

 

Not that it really matters, but was there a reason for getting the 650 and not the 660?

 

I've not told you the full story....

The reason I bought the 650 was because I had a big ash to come down, this is going back a few years, the biggest saw I had then was a 044, so went to Gustharts the day before the job and they didn't have a 660 or 880 in stock, biggest they had was the 650 so I was pushed into making the decision that I wouldn't have go e for given the choice

Posted

Lol! And the rest was history as they say!

 

I guess in a situation like that its got to be done, but in the world of a tree climber it's all about having the most amount of power in the tree from the lightest saw, so some of these lesser powered versions of the same saw always seem pointless to me. Often there's only a few quid difference to the next size up too, so unless budgets are so tight I can't see the point of getting the lower powered one. Your situation was needs must of course.

 

.

Posted

It might just be me (and I am pretty non-biased, I've always run both Stihl and Husky) but it seems that Stihl can only make good big saws now.

 

I don't think anyone has a bad word to say about the 660. It is an awesome saw, and will pull a 36" if you ask it to.

 

Huskys seem to be the go-to saw now, including topper.

 

My 3 five years ago would have been 361, 440, 660.

 

Now it would be 560, 572, 660.

Posted

I worked for years with a 254 and a 385, still have both, the 385 still going strong, and the 254 soon to return from spud having been tweaked. Both great saws.

 

I have to say that the Makita / dolmar 7901 IS a serious alternative to the 460 / 372...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.