Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have received some info regarding a young man being allowed to bottle out of going above 12ft on his arial rescue certificate and still being passed despite obvious nerves and a lack of comfort in climbing.

 

This on top of various other statements regarding assessments for NPTC certifications. I feel this one is a serious enough issue to start raising some concern over what really is going on with these essential tickets.

 

I also feel this just proves that this is now all a tick box exercise that no one is taking seriously anymore, as this young lad is now potentially able t be sent out with a climber to act as rescue candidate.

 

this is unacceptable IMO and It degrades the system.

 

I do appreciate that the \NPTC is a basic assessment of competence, but this is an area of competence that should be more tightly monitored and has very serious ramifications.

 

I am not being a drama queen, this is not on.

 

thoughts and opinions on this please

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
  Tony Croft aka hamadryad said:
I have received some info regarding a young man being allowed to bottle out of going above 12ft on his arial rescue certificate and still being passed despite obvious nerves and a lack of comfort in climbing.

 

This on top of various other statements regarding assessments for NPTC certifications. I feel this one is a serious enough issue to start raising some concern over what really is going on with these essential tickets.

 

I also feel this just proves that this is now all a tick box exercise that no one is taking seriously anymore, as this young lad is now potentially able t be sent out with a climber to act as rescue candidate.

 

this is unacceptable IMO and It degrades the system.

 

I do appreciate that the NPTC is a basic assessment of competence, but this is an area of competence that should be more tightly monitored and has very serious ramifications.

 

I am not being a drama queen, this is not on.

 

thoughts and opinions on this please

 

Is this first hand information or hear say??

 

If its the latter this thread should end here untill you have FACTS

Posted
  Tony Croft aka hamadryad said:
Do I have permission to give names and dates locations?

 

I wouldn't have said so Tony. Surely this would be more an issue with the individual assessor than the actual process would it not?

Posted

If you have recently passed or tried to gain NPTC certificates for chainsaw operations and would like to tell me about your experience please email me treewisperer@hotmail.co.uk

 

if you wanna be off record thats fine, but would like to hear at least from a few who would be happy to be on the record.

 

I am particularly looking to hear from new/young lads taking their first steps into the industry via NPTC certifications.

Posted

This is a very poor situation.

 

Assessment requirements

 

The height of the final anchor point must be suitable for the operation and must be at least 12 metres. It is expected that it will normally be higher

AERIAL RESCUE

The casualty is secured in the tree or on a ‘pole’ (standing stem) at least five metres from the ground

 

If you have firm evidence this needs reporting to NPTC,

 

Tree climbing assessments should follow the rope access example,

Pass your climbing assessment then after one years experience 1000 hrs recorded, then be able to do the AERIAL RESCUE

Posted

When I did the CS39 , there was lad climbing beside me , at one point he was NOT roped in at all and the assessor seen him , told him to come down and sent him home on the spot , he probable saved that guy's life.

Posted
  Gollum said:
This is a very poor situation.

 

Assessment requirements

 

The height of the final anchor point must be suitable for the operation and must be at least 12 metres.

 

If you have firm evidence this needs reporting to NPTC,

 

 

in your opening post Tony you said 12ft.....the person telling it didnt get mixed up and it was 12mtrs perhaps?:001_smile:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Read more  

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.