Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

AA Guide to the Use of MEWPs in Arboriculture


Amelanchier
 Share

Recommended Posts

I reckon its cause he doesnt know how to use the controls so the other guy on the right has to go up with him, there in lies the problem. If you cant operate a MEWP you shouldn't be using it for work positioning, especially during rigging operations where work positioning is critical.

 

Dont know what the guide says, but in my humble opinion MEWPS should only be used for rigging operations by experienced climbers .

 

I have always found it easier with two in the bucket so long as the operator on the controls is competent, you can be looking ahead to where you want the bucket whilst the man on the controls is positioning it.

 

5976538f23c92_refusals20and20site20photos20023.jpg.87bd4505aee33dbd8849c360eb943c35.jpg

 

Chain brake used at all times whilst the saw is in the bucket, method agreed by both operators of work in bucket before starting work, ballistic trousers and jackets at all times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I dont know about anyone else, but I dont really share the opinion that mewps ARE safer. I've experienced problems with the operating levers on an older mewp, I've been on site when a mewp suddenly slewed and dumped down across a highway, Deans mewp doesnt enamour me to them either. Yes, it may be a fact that recorded accident figures,at the moment, are lower than climbing accidents, but for how long? As more and more mewp usage, for all trades, comes into play, then the figures will go up. How long before the H&S, the AA et al, then decide that it was safer to climb all along?

 

:dito:

 

What bothers me is suppose you or one of your your employees has an accident and the HSE turn up and say that you should have been in a mewp and give you agro. The fact that by the time you priced in the mewp and the traffic lights to go round it you would have been three times the price of everyone else probably would'nt bother them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy, Leaving the RQ incident aside, do we know where these older/failing MEWPS are being sourced from ?

are they registered, are they 6 monthly LOLERed by certified personel.

 

Admitedly my bills are payed for, so I don't posses the same financial constraints as many on here possibly have, I would however go nowhere near a machine with out either of the above, as minimum.

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy, Leaving the RQ incident aside, do we know where these older/failing MEWPS are being sourced from ?

are they registered, are they 6 monthly LOLERed by certified personel.

 

Admitedly my bills are payed for, so I don't posses the same financial constraints as many on here possibly have, I would however go nowhere near a machine with out either of the above, as minimum.

.

Both companies who had the machines were very good on all equipment inspections/tests etc, but these events still occured. In the case where mine failed, it would not have done had it been a newer model. As it was an old model, mounted (professionaly) on a landy, it had no STOP button in the basket. A twig snagged in the exteral levers, forcing the down lever, down, with no chance of pulling it back up. As it powered down, forcing the bucket down into the hedgerow, it forced the leg ram back up tipping the truck over. My colleague couldnt open the door to access the interior stop button, so hit the button thru the side window with a fibre-glass rod. Following this, al these lifts were fitted with a bucket mounted Stop button, but could have been a very nasty accident. As for the incident where the cherry-picker slewed across the highway, I dont know the actual cause of this, as itwas a seperate company, and I wasnt privy to the details.

The Landy mounted was sourced from the local REC btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you get used to the machine you can operate it without looking at the controls.

 

I can operate mine with one hand without turning round to see what I'm doing.

 

One of the problems is the working envelope is reduce with two men, plus tackle. Then if you do cut and hold a branch, you have the weight of the branch suddenly adding to the equation when there may only be a few kilos short of the 200kg max, enough to trip the machine or even worse, tip it.

 

With one man in the basket you have a large margin for error

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was told on my 38 course that we have to justify not using one these days, and justify it properly. thanks to work at height covering so many different industries we have to go through...

 

1. can it be done from the ground?

 

2. from fixed raised platform (scaffolding)?

 

3. MEWP?

 

4. rope and harness last resort

 

thankfully ladders dont come into it.

 

as for justification, aparently cost and lack of trained operators are not sufficient. access, terrain, and actual job (having to gain access to inner crown) are good enough reasons not to use one.

 

fairly barking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you get used to the machine you can operate it without looking at the controls.

 

I can operate mine with one hand without turning round to see what I'm doing.

 

One of the problems is the working envelope is reduce with two men, plus tackle. Then if you do cut and hold a branch, you have the weight of the branch suddenly adding to the equation when there may only be a few kilos short of the 200kg max, enough to trip the machine or even worse, tip it.

 

With one man in the basket you have a large margin for error

 

Agree with all that.

 

You don't look at the controls when your driving a car do you?

 

I prefer to work in a basket by myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy, Leaving the RQ incident aside, do we know where these older/failing MEWPS are being sourced from ?

are they registered, are they 6 monthly LOLERed by certified personel.

 

Admitedly my bills are payed for, so I don't posses the same financial constraints as many on here possibly have, I would however go nowhere near a machine with out either of the above, as minimum.

 

 

 

.

 

I think a mewp comes under puwer.!:confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.