Liberalism gone mad!

[Matt Butler]

So is Jesus dead??

 

God raised him from the dead, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. Acts 2:24

[WeeDee]

I do think we realy have to think carefuly before we make to many clames about Jesus......this applys to what i say as well

 

What do you mean?

 

To claim 'He gave everything' is practicing care - but to claim otherwise is being careless?

[skyhuck]

I do think we realy have to think carefuly before we make to many clames about Jesus......this applys to what i say as well

 

But his statement is true.

 

Your statement is like saying we should think very carefully before spilling salt or going under a ladder, for those of us who prefer fact to fiction there is nothing to fear

[Matt Butler]

And He hardly gave everything he had when he was able to reclaim it all back, undamaged and with interest.

 

True, apart from the fact that its not undamaged, Revelation tells me that He still has the scars

[Lee Winger]

could we get back on topic

 

I personally don't have any probs with Christians bringing up foster kids, and imo they're in there rights to say they don't agree with homosexuality, which imo has become more of a lifestyle choice than a persuasion

Edited February 28, 2011 by Lee Winger

[skyhuck]

God raised him from the dead, because it was not possible that He should be held by it. Acts 2:24

 

So he lost nothing.

[Mesterh]

I think Christians have made more than enough claims about Jesus for everyone.

 

Jesus may have existed as a man but 'God' doesnt.

[butler]

I guess this is a tricky subject and very emotinal for lots of us...i can total see where everyone is coming from i especial see skyhucks point, there was i time when i felt like that...however i got past the rebelion and finaly accepted God into my life...i do realise that this thread could get heated so i hope to make this my last post to stop me getting to heated...i would like to say however...WE WOULD BE FOOLISH NOT TO CONSIDER (EVEN IF JUST FOR A SHORT TIME) GOD...i hope this is taken in the way it was intended

[WeeDee]

True, apart from the fact that its not undamaged, Revelation tells me that He still has the scars

 

If He is God, then He chooses to have the scars, He chooses to be damaged. Nothing occurs against His will. He cannot be portrayed as a victim of circumstance.

[tommer9]

But you cant use the bible as a way of proving or disproving anything- that just doesnt make sense!!

Quotiing from a source that the other side of a debate sees as complete fiction is useless in attemting to back up one side of a debate- it holds no water whatsoever, in fact it is as futile as me quoting a philosophers beliefs- which would be laughable....because that is all that christianity is- belief, so therefore cannot be used to prove ANYTHING.

At best it is no more than a set of philosophies attempting to find a reason for our exicstence, at worst it is a form of social and intellectual rape!!