Liberalism gone mad!

[WeeDee]

Out of interest, where would you stand if the word homosexual was replaced by another minority group? For instance, suppose we directly swapped christian and homosexual, thus meaning that a gay couple would refuse to tell a foster child that it was ok to be a christian?

 

Or to extend this thought further still - should we remove children from all the couples who are planning to tell own their child that homosexuality is wrong?

 

Don't get me wrong, I am an aethiest - but after exploring religion, not ignoring it. If I am to be allowed my own 'explanation' of it all, then I must allow others to have their view (even a religious one).

 

My problem comes with belief systems that are just self-supporting and adopted by people who have never considered the alternative.

[TRADITIONAL LOGGERS]

Views are fine provided it does not offend someone else.

[Steve Bullman]

Views are fine provided it does not offend someone else.

 

yeah, cos that never happens round here!!

[TRADITIONAL LOGGERS]

yeah, cos that never happens round here!!

 

Yeah and I would like to keep on the forum. More fuel on the fire.

[Steve Bullman]

i predict this thread wont exist by this time tomorrow anyhow

[felixthelogchopper]

i predict this thread wont exist by this time tomorrow anyhow

 

Best be offensive before it goes then

[felixthelogchopper]

Isnt that what half the liberalised law makers are doing?

 

Don't even get me started on what you get up to in the Dengie

[Steve Bullman]

Best be offensive before it goes then

 

threads arent the only things that can disappear :001_tongue:

[Arbgirl]

BBC News - Christian foster couple lose 'homosexuality views' case

 

Did you mean this article? As the one you posted a link to was from 2008? They lost the case and are no longer allowed to foster.

[felixthelogchopper]

threads arent the only things that can disappear :001_tongue:

 

Sorry boss ( tugs forelock)