Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Fagus with Ganoderma


John Hancock
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dismantling is easier to chip and tidy up as well. Learnt that lesson last week after we felled an 80ft-ish ash tree in one and then spent a day and a half trying to chip the shattered and tangle brash. Yuk!!

 

 

I know where you’re coming from! Much easier to be in the tree, I can dictate how fast the operation goes then. If I see the lads standing round, chatting...just 'lop' a bigger section out, that will wake them up!

 

I'm off to sprinkle some soil-conditioning fairy-dust now, on any tree with a hazard rating of 5 and above. :wave:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm off to sprinkle some soil-conditioning fairy-dust now, on any tree with a hazard rating of 5 and above. :wave:

 

It can work, i'm sure this tree has a higher hazard rating, the option to fell this tree has been on the cards for a long time, I recently took pictures of all the defects, it has cavities, hazard beams, old braces and fungi (Polyporus squamosa).

 

Its been reduced 3 times now, the 3rd time was on this visit and we only reduced the section over the path and bike racks. The soil has been aerated and mulched with great results, no mycor or feed has been used.

 

The only problems with the work carried out is some sun scaled. The tree is showing signs of good vigour.

 

A replacement has been planted and is doing very well its to the left.

DSCN0035.jpg.1feeb2c2077ce1965d2ee38d94dadf3a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A replacement has been planted and is doing very well its to the left.

 

Going by your brief history of works, this looks to me like exactly where Modern Tree Care should be.

 

It appears that all stake holders in this Trees past, present and future have been professionaly, sympatheticaly and safely considered.

 

Well done to all involved :congrats:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can work, i'm sure this tree has a higher hazard rating, the option to fell this tree has been on the cards for a long time, I recently took pictures of all the defects, it has cavities, hazard beams, old braces and fungi (Polyporus squamosa).

 

Its been reduced 3 times now, the 3rd time was on this visit and we only reduced the section over the path and bike racks. The soil has been aerated and mulched with great results, no mycor or feed has been used.

 

The only problems with the work carried out is some sun scaled. The tree is showing signs of good vigour.

 

A replacement has been planted and is doing very well its to the left.

 

 

Nice tree, in a very prominent position. Do you mean Polyporus squamosus (dryad’s saddle)? We get a lot of that here Worcestershire. As you know its usually confined to trees which have been ‘topped’ or damaged by excessively large or numerous pruning wounds or storm breakage.

 

The beech in Fort Royal was host to Ganoderma Sp. A completely different fungi with different decay characteristics, which can lead to mechanical failure of the stem base or root-plate.

 

I wouldn’t like to comment on which tree has the highest hazard rating as we are talking about two different trees, in different locations with different host pathogens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice tree, in a very prominent position. Do you mean Polyporus squamosus (dryad’s saddle)? We get a lot of that here Worcestershire. As you know its usually confined to trees which have been ‘topped’ or damaged by excessively large or numerous pruning wounds or storm breakage.

 

The beech in Fort Royal was host to Ganoderma Sp. A completely different fungi with different decay characteristics, which can lead to mechanical failure of the stem base or root-plate.

 

I wouldn’t like to comment on which tree has the highest hazard rating as we are talking about two different trees, in different locations with different host pathogens.

 

The dryads saddle is in and old limb drop wound and seems to be contained.

 

Ganoderma is a deffirent kettle of fish, it was wrong of me to mention hazard ratings, it just sometime's you have to go with gut instinct as well as common sense.

Not all companies I know would of retained the Beech I pictured for so long, just pointing out alternatives can work.

 

We have felled many council Beech tree like yours sometimes for them its the more sensible option rather than the future maintenance cost and regular inspection schedules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Thought it would be safe to hijack someone else's thread after two years. The title 'Beech with ganoderma' seemed appropriate somehow.

 

This little baby came down one night last week in woods near Horsham. The creaking before it went woke a lady 150 yards away and when the tree went over the crash made her jump out of bed in fright!

 

From my extensive research of photos in Encyclopedia ArbTalk I'm guessing G.applanatum?. How/what/why and 'you're way off the mark' comments most welcome.

 

One thing that struck me was the apparently small number of FBs that I could find; probably only a dozen on the whole tree, several in the buttress unions, yet just look at the condition of the wood.

 

A very rough guess at the tree's age is ~120 years but I could be way off; that's based on knowledge of local land use rather than the tree. Also the ground there (Sussex Weald clay) is hugely fertile.

 

The lad in the last pic is 6' tall for size comparison.

59765643391ee_Beech12.jpg.8806a1da2f546aa5e4859caadf85f867.jpg

5976564335bc2_Beech8.jpg.ff725572b897a27d17383d4cbe934b99.jpg

5976564334029_Beech7.jpg.35d0df7f38b0bcc7a5b858cedd18b5c2.jpg

597656432fee3_Beech5.jpg.9f08f0fe641df068480a084a21b605cb.jpg

597656432cd79_Beech4.jpg.1e5c0e77441c59381542ef0c029c3530.jpg

597656432a6db_Beech3.jpg.bf4e7fb50d0580d9d7b0d86060216a12.jpg

5976564326341_Beech1.jpg.46f47dce530eaf828436c5b5ff7f4b54.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought it would be safe to hijack someone else's thread after two years. The title 'Beech with ganoderma' seemed appropriate somehow.

 

This little baby came down one night last week in woods near Horsham. The creaking before it went woke a lady 150 yards away and when the tree went over the crash made her jump out of bed in fright!

 

From my extensive research of photos in Encyclopedia ArbTalk I'm guessing G.applanatum?. How/what/why and 'you're way off the mark' comments most welcome.

 

One thing that struck me was the apparently small number of FBs that I could find; probably only a dozen on the whole tree, several in the buttress unions, yet just look at the condition of the wood.

 

A very rough guess at the tree's age is ~120 years but I could be way off; that's based on knowledge of local land use rather than the tree. Also the ground there (Sussex Weald clay) is hugely fertile.

 

The lad in the last pic is 6' tall for size comparison.

 

I would have to double at the least your age determinantion for this tree!

 

that beech is 300-400, the upper limit for a mature unmanaged tree, pollards can go longer.

 

Great photos, and hard to say on the Gano from those images, but would hazard a guess its applanatum too going by the rot and failure, applanatum being a more saprobic deadwood consumer.

 

I thoroughly enjoy going back to beeches like this after failure, the diversity of fungi that will break down this old warrior will suprise you and give you a decade at the least of interesting and tasty finds!

 

What a shame this old girl has fallen, but even now, in her demise, she will give rise to an amazing array of organisms and for many many decades.

 

good post!

Edited by Tony Croft aka hamadryad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, there you are! Was hoping for your comment. I'll happily accept your age estimate. I did think I was being conservative I'll admit but my knowledge of local land use heavily influenced the guess, plainly along with poor knowledge of how fast/slow such a tree would grow.

The circumstances of the woods' ownership give this tree a good chance of being left alone - I hope. The public use it a bit but there is absolutely no management. If I think there comes a time when there is obvious and considerable danger I may try and settle the tree with a Tirfor but I'm certainly not going to take a saw to it: I'm not qualified or experienced in such work and am also looking forward to a natural future for it. Fingers crossed everyone leaves it be.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.