Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Aerial Rescue Practice


krummholz
 Share

Recommended Posts

I agree with a lot of points about the limitations of rescue in reality. I cut myself in 2006 and if I had not self rescued then it would have been a corpse that they retrieved. 
 

A major issue I have is the fact that someone, with only a few days climbing under there belt, is allowed to train and qualify in ariel rescue. In reality these people are only useful for box ticking on a risk assessment.

 

If we want a strong trained workforce, we need to change the training structure fundamentally. As an employer training staff, I want to pay nothing, have my staff off work for 10 minutes and they need to be able to climb and dismantle any tree in a day when they have finished. Sounds unreasonable? It’s the truth for most.

 

A simple solution might be to change the training model, to one that requires time in the tree before progressing. The rope access world successfully runs such a model and if we want as an industry to progress and be recognised then we need to change.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

12 hours ago, Pete Mctree said:

I agree with a lot of points about the limitations of rescue in reality. I cut myself in 2006 and if I had not self rescued then it would have been a corpse that they retrieved. 
 

A major issue I have is the fact that someone, with only a few days climbing under there belt, is allowed to train and qualify in ariel rescue. In reality these people are only useful for box ticking on a risk assessment.

 

If we want a strong trained workforce, we need to change the training structure fundamentally. As an employer training staff, I want to pay nothing, have my staff off work for 10 minutes and they need to be able to climb and dismantle any tree in a day when they have finished. Sounds unreasonable? It’s the truth for most.

 

A simple solution might be to change the training model, to one that requires time in the tree before progressing. The rope access world successfully runs such a model and if we want as an industry to progress and be recognised then we need to change.

 

The FCA proposed going back to basics a while back in regard to Forestry training.

An employee could do a 5 day training course in say, CMCC & felling up to 380mm (CS30/31) and then consolidate these skills under the guidance of their employer, getting a logged journal completed, hours on the saw per task etc, before sitting the NPTC assessment, can’t see why this couldn’t be carried over to Arb.

FISA and just about everyone else rubbished the idea, claiming it would be too difficult to manage, I can’t see why, that’s how it was when I started out, anything is doable with the right management, people just can’t be arsed.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Bullman said:

Why sell one training course when you can sell 10

Surely there is the opportunity (expectation?) for the 6 monthly aerial rescue practices to be self led - everyone has their aerial rescue ticket and so is a competent and certificated climber, so at the moment there's no requirement for a trainer to be present. However, without any guidance from the AA on the 6 monthly practice, busy managers and business owners with stretched resources are even less likely to schedule the practice even though we've been told in the TG1 it's mandatory.

 

Given that it's mandatory I also wonder what the implications of NOT doing the practice or having any records of it are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 years in the fire service has taught me, you can train as much as you want, the reality of a situation that is being described here will bare no resemblance to training for it. 

I admire the stance of the op, but how far are we prepared to take it? Refuse to work if training competencies aren't up to date?

Unfortunately,  that wouldn't get you very far in this industry.  Another point, I can envisage a scenario where a qualified, competent Climber could go to pieces in a serious situation,  and a groundsman that has never climbed a tree in his life could come to the fore.

Think someone mentioned this before,  It must be a rare occurrence, any stats?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, krummholz said:

Given that it's mandatory I also wonder what the implications of NOT doing the practice or having any records of it are?

The implications are obvious, same as knowingly allowing your employees to work on one rope. Your Insurance will use it as an excuse not to pay out and HSE will use it as a lever in any court action.

All any employer has to do as part of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Act is to run regular refreshers/updates/training days, call them what you want.

No trainer has to be there, no course fees, training can be done ‘in house’ and recorded on the back of a fag packet if need be, it’s not hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Con said:

 

I admire the stance of the op, but how far are we prepared to take it? Refuse to work if training competencies aren't up to date?

Unfortunately,  that wouldn't get you very far in this industry.

Again, surely this is a problem? Various posters have stated that they often work without a designated rescue climber or one they know would be unlikely to effectively rescue them. What's the cost in walking away from work that will put you in an unacceptable risky position? A days wage? Versus loss of life or limb?

 

You wouldn't work for someone without professional Insurances, so what's the harm in asking about the last time they practiced aerial rescue?

 

A rising tide lifts all boats

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, krummholz said:

You wouldn't work for someone without professional Insurances, so what's the harm in asking about the last time they practiced aerial rescue?

So you ask that question, they say “last week”… are you going to demand written proof or get up that tree you are being paid to dismantle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.