Jump to content

krummholz

Member
  • Content Count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About krummholz

  • Rank
    Junior Member

Personal Information

  • Location:
    Glasgow

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It is a double slic pin which is less likely to pop out. It's nice for a quick alternative to the maillon, such as a base tie for ascent, or advancing your anchor or a simple redirect, but I've not worked off one for the whole tree.
  2. Ah I did mean UltraO, I'm always getting those 2 mixed up
  3. PerfectO are good, you might want to pop a rubber stopper on the far side to stop everything riding round
  4. So was the Singing Tree Quickie CE marked? I ended up getting the Notch one for some reason which isn't CE marked, but remember that one had the mark and t'other didn't though they were the same price. Can't seem to find the Singing Tree one for sale anywhere, and no idea when the notch one will get it's CE marked.
  5. +1 for getting a longer 60m rope, makes traversing or redirects much more doable. I've got 50m of Sterling HTP and it's surprising how often it's only just long enough after a base tie on a large tree. Maybe add a maillon or anchor ring for a base tie and/or canopy anchor. I wouldn't say you're over egging it, it's good to focus on the ascent aspect of SRT systems as that's where you'll see the most benefit initially. Other benefits will come as you gain more experience and knowledge of the system. Gear for redirects can easily be found in stuff you'll already have (HMS karabiner, sling, e2e hitch chord etc.) (At first read of your post title I legit thought your wife was leaving you and you were buying some SRT kit to cheer yourself up...)
  6. Wow talking about the bend radius of the gyro takes me way back to the beginning of the thread. What a journey it's been.
  7. I had wondered if it was because you're adding an extra component in, an extra link in the chain that can potentially fail. The benefits conveyed but the use of the gyro far outweigh the risk of failure imo. I'm going to try either a Petzl Open with some rubbers to keep the gyro away from loading the wee plastic section, or the Courant Odin.
  8. Thankyou for your interest in my balls but I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
  9. Ok so a gyro on a semi-permanent connection such as the DMM shackle pictured above or Petzel Open ring would be compliant also?
  10. I was under the impression that it wasn't kosher to run 2 rope systems through a single attachment point to the harness (such as a Gyro) and had started to write a justification for using it, but going back to the ICOP and draft Technical Guide 1 I can't actually find anything stating that you can't do that...In fact I found the opposite - In the draft technical guide 6.6.1 b) states "The same point on the harness may be used to connect the primary and backup systems". Has this changed? Or where am I getting the 2 seperate connections to harness thing from?😵
  11. I'd put this in the employment section too, climbers looking for work will be going there rather than here.
  12. Is this for recreational use or for tree work? If for tree work then you'd be better off using a more versatile system, incorporating a descender like the TAZ Lov2 to capture progress and then be able to descend (replacing the Croll/Basic ascender in your picture), and that way you'd be rigged for rescue. Look into knee ascenders, much more efficient than frogwalking. Also why use 10mm line? The new ICOP doesn't actually seem to mention a minimum diameter for rope (just a MBS which a lot of 10mm cords surpass) but most ascenders/devices for industrial and work use require a minimum 11mm diamter rope. Lots of useful info and resources on youtube if you can't get on an intro to SRT course at the moment.
  13. I was actually told at college thickness of the bottom of the thigh just above the knee - quite a bit more variation there amongst folks...
  14. Interesting, looks very similar to the ISC Rocker but the Rocker user guidance states that full body harness should be used.
  15. Wouldn't you need a dorsal attachment on a full body harness for the ASAP or any other type of fall arrest device? Fine if you're dangling off the side of a skyscraper washing windows but probably a bit annoying in a hairy lime tree... AFAIK rope access anchors are tested regularly using HYDRAJAWS or similar, again something that's fine for permanent anchors on buildings that are returned to regularly but less practicable for tree work.

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.