Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Rate a Reduction Thread


benedmonds
 Share

Recommended Posts

I also find it disheartening working on a previously badly pruned tree.

I get alot of urban trees people want retaining that have been through some very unkind hands.

This oak was one where I again failed to sell my ideas to the client.

It has a huge 'amplere' as they say here massive wide crown, quite a local reference.

It now has a great deal of bacterial flux on the stem, strong enough to smell when cycling past.

 

IMG_20210322_151852.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

5 hours ago, Mark Bolam said:

The problem is people see badly reduced hatracked trees, often for no reason, and think - ‘Oh, I better get mine done like that then’.

 

The public are thick as pig shit, generally.

What I find most disheartening is when I work hard to reduce carefully so it almost looks like it hasn't been cut, and the customers answer is "oh I thought you'd take more off"

 

Last time this happened I'd taken about 12 feet out of a birch and they waited till we'd tidied and raked up before coming out with it. Closest I have come to losing my cool with a customer - decided we'd have lunch break while they had a think and when we came back they decided they liked it after all.

 

Sometimes I think it would be easier to mow it all off to stubs, customers probably just as happy.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The anti reduction brigade should consider the long term consequences of not reducing trees. 

There is a place for reductions in urban areas and they can keep trees looking OK. 

 

I put in an application today to reduce a TPO'd sycamore that we have done previously in 2006,  2013, 2017 and now again in 2022.  I am pretty sure I recommended its removal in 2006 but the council would not go with that.  I have had another 4 days work since maintaining it.

 

 

89597750_14orchardst20172022.thumb.jpg.7a0f03d1d74e61dc54263fe033e33394.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely agree. 

 

Below is a Cedar reduction I did a few months ago. 

Reason was to reduce the chance of snap outs and for the client to feel more confident in keeping the tree. 

 

Also a large Poplar in the back ground which I reduced the regrowth for the same reason. 

 

 

IMG_20211216_124307.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.