BS5837 refusal

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

On 03/02/2021 at 09:52, Khriss said:

Did the app doc get posted ?  K

Not yet, shame really...

[Khriss]

34 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Not yet, shame really...

Dont want to queer his pitch obvs  ( can you say that now  🤔)  K

[Stubby]

1 hour ago, Khriss said:

Dont want to queer his pitch obvs  ( can you say that now  🤔)  K

You can't say pitch FFS !

[Khriss]

Was going to say something else,  but TO might be listening in, walls have ears Mr Stubby, and make sure yr blackout is tight tonight, bombers moon. K

[Chris at eden]

On 03/02/2021 at 09:48, Jon Heuch said:

Ultimately, the planning officer & the tree officer to a lesser extent will need to consider what might happen if the matter went to appeal; is their argument reasonable? does it carry any weight within the context of the planning priorities & policies? would an Inspector overturn the council's decision for refusal based on the tree officer's desire to remove trees? I think it likely. I would just stick to your guns and make sure that the trees are the only reason the council wishes to refuse the application.

 

Most planning officers would probably listen to the tree officer & then ignore them. Planning permission granted!

To  add to what Jon said, if it went to appeal and it could be shown the LPA had acted unreasonably, you would have a good case to put in for costs. 

[richyrich]

As previously mentioned- can you post some photos of the trees?