Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Husky hedge cutter on aspen


miker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

To be fair, Stihl and Husqvarna do recommend the use of their own proprietary Alkylate fuels (Motomix etc) which, last time I checked, was the same price as Aspen which is an equivalent fuel. So the "Do the manufacturers recommend it" comment is a little null and void. Of course they won't say "It makes our tools last longer" because it would be a PR headache but instead they say it increases all round performance which in laymans terms means the saw will last longer. Bit like Ford specification oil, you can buy it from a dealer for x amount or buy Castrol for the same/less. At the end of the day it's all the same stuff, Alkylate fuel and a fully synthetic oil. If you want to run mineral oil and bargain pump fuel then go ahead but my asthmatic lungs do seem to thank me for not using petrol. 

You can use whatever supplier you want but at least aspen has some voice in this community and when I asked them about oils, testing and proof they did back themselves up which I give them credit for. 

 

I suppose if Alkylate fuels were garbage then the German forest workers must buy new saws every could of hours..... 

Edited by Paddy1000111
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I read a test  paper that measured  emssions the results said the catalyst had more   effect on emssions but nobody mentions them apart from removing the cat to aid preformace.

 

So surely cats should be replaced regular if you really care about emissions above using aspen.

 

image.png.ebed2e90d035754f07c591c1567eb3e8.png

Edited by Stere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just about the basic emissions though. It's more about the sulphur, benzine, aromatics etc, i.e the cancer causing headache chemicals that alkylate fuels don't have.

 

It's a bit like cigarettes Vs vaping. Neither are good for you and depending what you get they could have the same amount of nicotine. Vaping doesn't have all the other 300 carcinogenic chemicals in that cigarettes do! 

Edited by Paddy1000111
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stere said:

 I read a test  paper that measured  emssions the results said the catalyst had more   effect on emssions but nobody mentions them apart from removing the cat to aid preformace.

 

So surely cats should be replaced regular if you really care about emissions above using aspen.

 

image.png.ebed2e90d035754f07c591c1567eb3e8.png

THC is total hydrocarbons? and they are gaseous rather than particulates? It's a high figure but presumably includes oil flung off the bar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.