Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi there, 

 

Just a quick question,

 

Can the Husqvarna 262 and Husqvarna 262xp use the same bars? 

 

The reason I ask is because I bought a bar that says it fits a Husqvarna 262 but I tried it on my Husqvarna 262xp and doesn't fit properly. 

 

Thank you. 

 

Matt

Edited by Matt2110

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)

I was under the impression that the 262 was an XP machine in the range 242XP, 254XP, 262XP, 256XP, 271XP etc

Generally if it has a vertically split crankcase, adjustable oiler and closed transfer ports, it is a pro saw and these were all pro saws.

Most of Husqvarna 65-70cc machines use their larger mount size - I reckon you have the wrong bar, how does it not fit?

I think the 262XP is the small mount and you may have the large mount bar?

Edited by spudulike
  • Like 2
Posted

yep i was tinking the same re; small and large 3/8ths bar mounts. Maybe they fitted the large bar mount to later incarnations of the 262XP?

Posted

I was looking at the Sugihara bar catalogue and the large mount for the 372 went through a listing of load of old school saws and the 262 was not on it... those small mount 3/8’s are a bit harder to come by as I use them on 560’s and 357’s and from memory the 262’s I ran over 20 years ago so it’s a bit hazy where on small mount too.

Posted

Not sure we are getting much feedback from the OP, a pic of the baron the mount would be useful...... you can take a horse to water but you cant make it wash your car as the old saying goes!

  • Like 1
Posted

The 261 was the non xp version. I had a ported 261 chassis with 262xp parts all over it at one point. The main difference was the cylinder.

 

140827704.ADgcGsgD.jpg

 

Posted

All 262s were xp, they had the 254 crankcase with a longer stroke con rod, it did have the small bar pad, as standard they ran 3/8 chain unlike the 254 on .325

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, adw said:

All 262s were xp, they had the 254 crankcase with a longer stroke con rod, it did have the small bar pad, as standard they ran 3/8 chain unlike the 254 on .325

I wanted to say that ! ?

Posted

Sorry sir, i am sure you would have put it more eloquently, i still have a new top cover assembly for one gathering dust.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, adw said:

Sorry sir, i am sure you would have put it more eloquently, i still have a new top cover assembly for one gathering dust.

No no Andrew . You were concise and to the point . I could not match you bud . ? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.