Top-handled saw

[Mick Dempsey]

Agreed, if you only had one, the bigger topper is the solution.

Edited November 3, 2019 by Mick Dempsey

[peatff]

4 hours ago, stihlmadasever said:

The saw is ported but it gives you an example of its potential.

https://youtu.be/xscrsh6xcgs

 

That is just wrong, take it off him and make him learn about using a saw.?

[stihlmadasever]

40 minutes ago, peatff said:

 

That is just wrong, take it off him and make him learn about using a saw.?

The shorts gave me a giggle....

Yanks dont care

Neither do i to be fair...?

[oldwoodcutter]

Putting his shorts to one side for a moment, I was watching his bar tip and had a cold shudder go down my spine.

[peatff]

29 minutes ago, stihlmadasever said:

The shorts gave me a giggle....

Yanks dont care

Neither do i to be fair...?

 

It wasn't the shorts it was the stretching up to cut the branches from the ground that got me.

[Mick Dempsey]

Stop being such depressingly nit picking twats.

[monkeybusiness]

Dunno if Husky have upped their game but we have a 540 and it is not as good as the Stihl 201s (which aren’t as good as the 200s, but that’s life unfortunately)!

[peatff]

2 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Stop being such depressingly nit picking twats.

Sorry Mick.

[Mick Dempsey]

7 minutes ago, peatff said:

Sorry Mick.

There he is, tuning a tiny saw like that perform like a 560 and all you can say is “ooh look at his shorts!” Instead of remarking on the performance.

 

 

[GuyMo]

2 hours ago, Steve Bullman said:

The little saws are great but are really a secondary saw to the arsenal. If you only have one topping saw then definetly go for the 201 or 540, no question about it 

Great, thanks Steve. Do you have a preference? I suppose the biggest consideration with the big saw is the weight? Over time I’ll amass an arsenal of them I’m sure, but do just need one for now.