Emissions, Global warming or a scam

[eggsarascal]

1 minute ago, Echo said:

Here is another problem with the current system, lots of commercial wind farms went up, 

and so did the price of electricity, why, because the big boys in the game for decades were loosing out, wind mills were producing and being paid for doing so, and the old establishment were selling less units, so they upped the price.

Government stood by and let private companies gain too much control ever the necessities of life, like water and electric, these items should be supplied at not much more than cost to people, and the small amount of profit left over would be there to pay for other things, like hospitals and schools, its all about money, and that is the real problem.

Have you ever worked in utilities?

[Echo]

Where I worked of did not work is irrelevant to climate change.

Edited April 4, 2019 by Echo

[eggsarascal]

2 minutes ago, Echo said:

Where I worked of did not work is irrelevant to climate change.

It's relevant to your post about utility companies making a small profit, and leaving a little over for other things.

[Echo]

Cant see the relevance.

[eggsarascal]

1 minute ago, Echo said:

Cant see the relevance.

You seem to expect to have your say but don't seem to want the facts, fair enough, I'll leave it.

 

Back to global warming.

[Echo]

Feel fee to give us the facts.

[AHPP]

4 hours ago, breffni said:

Who would decide how much say schooling costs? What if you wete a low earner and the cost was above what you could afford?

The market; the system that's consistently elevated living standards for as long as we've had the rule of law and enforceable property rights.

 

4 hours ago, Mr. Squirrel said:

But then we'd be separating the nation into very distinct class systems, where the rich could afford better education, health care etc. while the less well off would be left to struggle. Hardly seems reasonable?

As opposed to the separation of rich and poor now, where the poor are taxed like battery hens for state imitations of the aforementioned services and the rich merely keep what they earn and can afford things.

 

[AHPP]

4 hours ago, Woodworks said:

Fair enough just glad you are not in charge ?

You see, I'm annoyed about that very thing. I'd love to seize authority over every area of your life, and then return that authority to you with kindly advice to not let it slip away again.

[breffni]

9 minutes ago, AHPP said:

The market; the system that's consistently elevated living standards for as long as we've had the rule of law and enforceable property rights.

 

As opposed to the separation of rich and poor now, where the poor are taxed like battery hens for state imitations of the aforementioned services and the rich merely keep what they earn and can afford things.

 

That still doesn't explain how they'd pay for schooling.

[AHPP]

6 minutes ago, breffni said:

That still doesn't explain how they'd pay for schooling.

Probably with money, the extra money they'd have when the state isn't taking most of it (and is also too small and weak to otherwise impoverish them).