Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 minute ago, Haironyourchest said:

examples?

Carbon capture machines, but as you say, very expensive.

 

Biomass converted to biochar/charcoal and incorporated into soils.

 

Seaweed grown in ocean, cut and sunk to sea floor.

 

These are just the ones I've heard about, I haven't researched it further.

Posted (edited)

Essentially.... our beautiful blue oasis in the vastness of our part of the universe is very much like a petri dish  in a lab  with various bacteria in it, to use an analogy  .....sealed and in balance [ or not ] to all intents and purposes, from our very limited point of view.

 

Unfortunately for the whole of this balanced ecosystem some clever folk discovered stuff and stupidly trusted this information to the other anthropoids like the ones that I stand next to in the pub, in order to make money

 

For eons all was in balance.... just like the delicate balance that is on going in each of our super complicated bodies.... What arrogance is displayed when we presume to know anything definitively after the tiny amount of time that we THINK we've found any answers in.

 

On this planet it's only man that shits in his own nest... but it's all the millions of other species that are paying the price of our stupidity as we destroy the environment in our endless pursuit of greed and which may well prove to be the well deserved Achilles heal of the human races 'cancer' of the system.

 

    

Edited by Macpherson
things
  • Like 4
Posted

Our 200000 years is nowt to Gaia. 650MYA ago the whole earth was frozen and then covered in dessert in the Permian with 3x the level of CO2 today.
We are the one that will suffer. Many of our large cities are coastal, there will be water and food shortages.
I suppose at least Skegness will be no more

Posted
9 hours ago, the village idiot said:

This is another Christopher Monckton article.

 

Please look him up everybody.

Is it false though? You are not reading the message because you don't like the messenger. It's data - the IPCC have backpedelled. It's true, it's there in black and white.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Steve Bullman said:

It is but not sure of its relevance to climate change. In warmer times you get more snow so water is locked up partly outweighing melting in the Arctic but this not happening in Arctic regions and surprisingly much of sea level rise is nothing to do with melting ice but simply the seawater expanding as it warms. According to Wiki "Between 1993 and 2018, thermal expansion of the oceans contributed 42% to sea level rise"

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.