Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Cavanagh v Witley Parish Council - Tree Inspection Regimes


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

The judgement from this case is being shared across various sources.

 

Roadside Trees | Local Government Law

 

Bus driver crushed by tree in his cab wins damages claim against council - Worthing Herald

 

I find it most interesting that the 'National Tree Safety Group Guidance 'Common sense risk management of trees' is not seen as being relevant or even mentioned in the case notes?

 

Section 23 only mentions these four documents as being available to land owners providing guidance.

DoT (2005) Well maintained Highways Code of Practice,

HSE Sector Information Minute (2007),

FC Practice Guide (2000) Hazards form Trees

DoE Circular Roads 52/75 Inspection of Highway Trees.

 

Surely it should have been mentioned by the three ‘expert’ witnesses so that Judge Macduff could have made a reasonable assessment of the facts and make a fully relevant judgement.

 

 

The authors of the NTSG guidance must wonder at times why did they bother

 

 

 

.

Edited by David Humphries
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

The judgement from this case is being shared across various sources.

 

Roadside Trees | Local Government Law

 

Bus driver crushed by tree in his cab wins damages claim against council - Worthing Herald

 

I find it most interesting that the 'National Tree Safety Group Guidance 'Common sense risk management of trees' is not seen as being relevant or even mentioned in the case notes?

 

Section 23 only mentions these four documents as being available to land owners providing guidance.

DoT (2005) Well maintained Highways Code of Practice,

HSE Sector Information Minute (2007),

FC Practice Guide (2000) Hazards form Trees

DoE Circular Roads 52/75 Inspection of Highway Trees.

 

Surely it should have been mentioned by the three ‘expert’ witnesses so that Judge Macduff could have made a reasonable assessment of the facts and make a fully relevant judgement.

 

 

The authors of the NTSG guidance must wonder at times why did they bother

 

 

 

.

 

Remarkable that such a useful and relevant reference would be ignored / excluded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remarkable that such a useful and relevant reference would be ignored / excluded?

 

Yes but for the inspector it's a good case for time limiting his work and having PI that pays the legal costs.

 

I cannot guess how many hundreds of times I've driven past that tree since 1967 and not given it a second glance.

 

What was the failure, roots or stem?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.