Potus ???

[Mark J]

7 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

🤷‍♂️ That’s it ?? 

No, it clearly isn't:



Radicalised people are invariably evil sorts, it doesn't matter which side of a coin they are on.

Violent crime stemming from the steadfast belief in a 'Supremacist' ideology isn't a good thing.

Edited April 19 by Mark J

[Haironyourchest]

Left wing anarchists consistently slightly outperforming right wingers. Islamists absolutely dominating the field. Weird uptick in "unspecified" since 2018.. (edit - 2016, maybe not so weird).

Edited April 19 by Haironyourchest

[Johnsond]

8 minutes ago, Mark J said:

And that makes it alright?

Radicalised people are usually evil sorts, it doesn't matter which side of a coin they are on.

Violent crime stemming from the steadfast belief in a 'Supremacist' ideology isn't a good thing.

 Not at all but imo and that of the intelligence services the threat of Radical Islamist Terror attacks far outweigh anything ever in the UK. Statistics prove it time after time. This “Far right “  🤷‍♂️where are they mark ?  
Radical Islamist terror attacks  on the other hand are very easy to point out, you guys hate the facts but the facts are the truth. 

[Mark J]

15 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

 Not at all but imo and that of the intelligence services the threat of Radical Islamist Terror attacks far outweigh anything ever in the UK. Statistics prove it time after time. This “Far right “  🤷‍♂️where are they mark ?  
Radical Islamist terror attacks  on the other hand are very easy to point out, you guys hate the facts but the facts are the truth. 

No one is saying that the radical Islamic nutjobs aren't utter shitehawks. The point I want to make is that there are extremes on all sides and they should equally be regarded as the threat they are. 

Edited April 19 by Mark J

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

This “Far right “  🤷‍♂️where are they mark ?  
 

I'm not buying what you're selling, Dave.

 

[Johnsond]

2 minutes ago, Mark J said:

No one is saying that the radical Islamic nutjobs aren't utter shitehawks. The point I want to make is that there are extremes on all sides and they should all be treated the same. 

But your argument falls flat on its face when you look at the actual statistics and facts. 

[GarethM]

4 minutes ago, Mark J said:

No one is saying that the radical Islamic nutjobs aren't utter shitehawks. The point I want to make is that there are extremes on all sides and they should all be treated the same. 

And at the same time which moderate/leaders call out the radicals?.

 

Most Judeo-Christian types called out the priest fiddlers, they usually atleast recognise the bad and how it's not what they preach.

[Johnsond]

4 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I'm not buying what you're selling, Dave.

 

I didn’t think you would Mark, you ain’t a fan of facts or statistics 

[Mark J]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I didn’t think you would Mark, you ain’t a fan of facts or statistics 

"The point I want to make is that there are extremes on all sides and they should equally be regarded as the threat they are."

 

[Mark J]

14 minutes ago, GarethM said:

And at the same time which moderate/leaders call out the radicals?.

 

Most Judeo-Christian types called out the priest fiddlers, they usually atleast recognise the bad and how it's not what they preach.

Are you suggesting that moderate Muslims, who Dave approves of, don't call out the wrong-ones in our community on purpose? Or could it be that the wrong-ones operate under the radar of normal people? 

FYI: The Catholic and Anglican Church still hide dodgy clergy.
 

Edited April 19 by Mark J