Potus ???

[Johnsond]

3 hours ago, Steven P said:

 

At 2 in the morning, is JohnsonD'Senior Dating alone in bed tonight?

2 in the morning for you SP not me 😂😂😂😂 my god man are you retarded 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️ 

There’s a minus 5hrs time difference here compared to the UK. How many times have you been told this now ??. 
Maybe one of your teammates can explain the concept of time zones to you SP or maybe the time on my phone might help you. 
 

Edited June 25 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Oldfeller said:

and here you are yet again perpetuating the very thing you claim you want to stop, and yet another personal insult from you at the poster. 

you're  just as bad as the accusations you aim at others.

You will notice the silence from those of a similar libtard persuasion. Double standards based upon political beliefs abound here. I suspect you comprehend the time difference thing a bit better than SP, maybe he as Mark/42 alluded too not real. 

[Anno]

I think we need to see how well that aversion of War goes over the next few weeks before we heep praise on Uncle Orange, would seem it incited more than it stopped initially.

[Johnsond]

22 minutes ago, Anno said:

I think we need to see how well that aversion of War goes over the next few weeks before we heep praise on Uncle Orange, would seem it incited more than it stopped initially.

Rubbish 

[Johnsond]

[Anno]

46 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Rubbish 

Ah, the voice of reason again Rambo, tiresome as ever.

Why not spaff ou a load of crap from a few website, usually without any relevance to the subject discussed?

[Johnsond]

2 hours ago, Anno said:

Ah, the voice of reason again Rambo, tiresome as ever.

Why not spaff ou a load of crap from a few website, usually without any relevance to the subject discussed?

No need in this case Anus , the post was just standard Trump obsession type shit. 
he incited what exactly??. 
Now if you really want discuss incitement 🤷‍♂️

Edited June 25 by Johnsond

[Dan]

I'm not a fan of Trump at all. I'm also not a fan of the other candidate/side.

I think it'll be interesting to see how it works out for the USA. It's good he got such a big vote in all the houses, senate etc. It means we can see exactly how he performs. He's got nowhere to hide if it goes to shit. Likewise we can see what works and learn from it. 

 

 

[Anno]

13 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

No need in this case Anus , the post was just standard Trump obsession type shit. 
he incited what exactly??. 

Anus? hillarious, got any good 'poo poo' jokes, although I do expect that kind of thing coming from somebody who used the term 'retard' very recently.

If you read it I merely said lets wait and see how it pans out but you cannot resist the pull of getting the last comment in, unfortunately 9 times out of 10 its largely bullshit and posturing from you and your cronies whilst anyone else is not only wrong but ridiculed and made fun of in a very uninspired way.

Chill out, read a book and I sincerely hope you don't suffer from jetlag when you return to Earth's time zone.

[tree-fancier123]

 

The only way Trump can be sure Iran never gets a nuclear weapon is to invade and conquer the country

 

Analysts largely agree that no amount of bombing could totally eradicate Iran's nuclear programme, and have pointed out that the American and Israeli campaign could have the opposite effect. 

Dr Andreas Krieg, an expert in Middle East security and senior lecturer at King's College London's School of Security Studies, told MailOnline: 'Going after Iran's nuclear programme could reinforce Tehran's belief that a nuclear deterrent is not only justified but essential for regime survival'. 

'Rather than halting Iran's nuclear trajectory, the strikes may serve as a vindication of the logic that drives Iran's long-term nuclear ambition - deterrence through capability,' he said. 

Dr Andreas Boehm, international law expert at the University of St. Gallen, was even more forthright. 

'After the experiences of Ukraine, Libya and now Iran on the one hand, and North Korea on the other, there can be no other conclusion than that only the possession of nuclear weapons offers protection against attack,' he said. 

'For this or any subsequent Iranian regime, the path of negotiation is no longer an option. It will now work even more resolutely towards acquiring a nuclear bomb.'

Some Western leaders appear to share this view. French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters today he felt there was an 'increased' risk that Iran would attempt to enrich uranium secretly in the wake of US-Israeli attacks.