Potus ???

[tree-fancier123]

Highly enriched uranium 'moved from Fordow', Iranian sources claim

Senior Iranian sources have told Reuters most of the highly enriched uranium at the Fordow site had been moved away before the US attack.

 

the only way is a land invasion and scour the country with a Geiger counter

4 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Maybe understand how a depth charge works and you'll understand why they use bombs that get under a target.

 

You ever wonder why firework and munitions factories have strong wall and weak roofs ?.

that's what Iran is hoping everyone is thinking, so they can get on with their work now

[Oldfeller]

59 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

I find it funny you don’t even realise you are as bad as anyone on here. 

That maybe so, but the problem seems to be  "I'm apparently on the wrong side"

[GarethM]

14 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

Highly enriched uranium 'moved from Fordow', Iranian sources claim

Senior Iranian sources have told Reuters most of the highly enriched uranium at the Fordow site had been moved away before the US attack.

 

the only way is a land invasion and scour the country with a Geiger counter

that's what Iran is hoping everyone is thinking, so they can get on with their work now

Right, so tell us why they need highly enriched uranium for a peaceful reactor programme?.

 

Do you know why they remove plutonium when recycling nuclear fuel, other than the we can make bombs with it reason obviously ?.

[Mick Dempsey]

7 minutes ago, Oldfeller said:

That maybe so, but the problem seems to be  "I'm apparently on the wrong side"

Playing the victim now?

You seem to mistake people disagreeing with you with being persecuted. 
 

 

[Oldfeller]

45 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

You asked about saws in a thread related to Trump, you were given an reply regarding saws and Trump - what more can we do in this thread?

a simple answer would have been easy enough for most people, or as a long time member you could have suggested going to a more relative thread, instead you chose to avoid the question ,[something that you appear to be well known for] and trying to score points for being clever and applying the question to your favorite president. but you know that don't ya.

it seemed perfectly fine for anyone else to discuss saws, personal details, etc, on the very same thread, in fact it was positively encouraged by some.

 

[Oldfeller]

4 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Playing the victim now?

You seem to mistake people disagreeing with you with being persecuted. 
 

 

nice try mate, but no cigar.

someone avoiding a question of "what's your chosen chainsaw" hardly turns anyone into a victim does it.

[Johnsond]

4 hours ago, Mark J said:

Will you be volunteering to be boots on the ground in the next gulf war? If you're so sure of its validity?

It's not as if you have a soft cock for Blair and his Iraq based shenanigans. What is different this time?

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

[Stubby]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

Yea but he has a hedge cutter !

[GarethM]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

It's a turn of phrase that makes you wonder.

 

Maybe a soft cock is praise for the almost physical vomit inducing wretching at the thought of the war criminal, versus the obvious hard-on some have for Blair and Starmer ?

[Mark J]

3 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Yea but he has a hedge cutter !

I haven't got a hedge!