Potus ???

[Oldfeller]

back to how it was then.

still no input from whom the original question was asked,

maybe that speaks more than words.

 

[Johnsond]

3 hours ago, Oldfeller said:

It looks like it was occurring long before I got here.

now about that other simple question,, about saws.?

Good luck 

[Johnsond]

5 hours ago, sime42 said:

 

That's cos you're new, you're excused on this occasion. 

 

You need to provide your full name, location, profession, military service record, vehicle type, towing capacity, and coal provenance. To date.

 

 

That’s you pretty much covered a variety of threads the blagger was active on and contributed zero context for his BS views when asked . I’ll let you off with a bit of poetic license/ lies as it is often your way. 

Edited 14 hours ago by Johnsond

[Mark J]

5 hours ago, Johnsond said:

That’s you pretty much covered a variety of threads the blagger was active on and contributed zero context for his BS views when asked . I’ll let you off with a bit of poetic license/ lies as it is often your way. 

Try, for a week, to attempt to discuss the points raised in their pertinent threads. 

There is a message function if you want to contact someone. You could even report them if your skin is that thin that you're hurt by their words.

You don't need to spam the very bits out of every thread in your obsessive quest for "answers".

I realise it's good traffic for the site, but we'll all end up going somewhere else if you carry on like this. 

 
 

Edited 12 hours ago by Mark J
better edit

[Oldfeller]

But it's almost like once your political leanings are identified, there's a concerted effort to constantly provide content just to  rib the opposition, it would be fine if it were all confined to just one thread, then those that wish to "enter the arena" so to speak, know damn well what to expect, when it spreads through the entire forum it does give the wrong impression of the site, I'll wager many of the guys here in an  almost constant clash, could probably find a more common opinion of felling a tree, or reducing a crown as an example.

either that or simply ban the discussion of politics. and anything related to it.

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, Oldfeller said:

But it's almost like once your political leanings are identified, there's a concerted effort to constantly provide content just to  rib the opposition, it would be fine if it were all confined to just one thread, then those that wish to "enter the arena" so to speak, know damn well what to expect, when it spreads through the entire forum it does give the wrong impression of the site, I'll wager many of the guys here in an  almost constant clash, could probably find a more common opinion of felling a tree, or reducing a crown as an example.

either that or simply ban the discussion of politics. and anything related to it.

Utter shite. You only perceive that notion because you've been told to.

Most people are happy to discuss differing points of view, you'd have to be a self-centred ****************wit to think you were always right. 

Engage people in discussion, don't try and get their backs up for the sake of things. 

Stop bleating on like a lamb. 

[Oldfeller]

3 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Utter shite. You only perceive that notion because you've been told to.

Most people are happy to discuss differing points of view, you'd have to be a self-centred ****************wit to think you were always right. 

Engage people in discussion, don't try and get their backs up for the sake of things. 

Stop bleating on like a lamb. 

nobody told me to do anything , and for the record you feckin' gobshite prick, that sort of initial reply is a perfect feckin' example.

[tree-fancier123]

Why do these people have to keep writing swear words? Maybe it makes them feel more down to earth, in tune with the spirit of the people.

[Mesterh]

1 hour ago, Oldfeller said:

But it's almost like once your political leanings are identified, there's a concerted effort to constantly provide content just to  rib the opposition, i

You should do what Mr Johnsond says when someone complains about his content in a thread. Move on and ignore it. 

 

 

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

Try, for a week, to attempt to discuss the points raised in their pertinent threads. 

There is a message function if you want to contact someone. You could even report them if your skin is that thin that you're hurt by their words.

You don't need to spam the very bits out of every thread in your obsessive quest for "answers".

I realise it's good traffic for the site, but we'll all end up going somewhere else if you carry on like this. 

 
 

You see mark it’s very difficult to discuss anything with a blagger who won’t answer any questions he deems uncomfortable, the whole silence or ignoring things is his well known and often used tactic. 
It’s not an obsession as such ( not like the trumpers on here suffering from the syndrome) rather an amusing interlude to a long day. I do wonder if his libtard politics didn’t align so well with your libtard politics whether you’d be here sticking up for a blatant BS blagger. I’m pretty sure if it were me hiding and avoiding answering pertinent questions during debates you’d be howling with the rest of the ATL big time. 

Edited 10 hours ago by Johnsond