All Activity

Behoves is another favourite of mine, always comes with ‘ill’

Yes. Someone blew themselves up with their own bomb. Hoisted by their own petard.

After watching that new take that documentary on Netflix my opinion of Robbie and the rest of take that has not changed and I’m usually nostalgic about 90’s stuff but I can say I’ve awlays hated them with a passion… I’ve maybe grown to appreciate dire straits but I don’t think Robbie and his mates will ever hold anything but loathing… maybe followed closely by E17 and blue

I think pétard is the French word for banger, firecracker. I remember the thrill of being able to buy them freely from le tabac on a French exchange at school.

Nice weather for ducks. Miserable for us.

Wordle 1,692 X/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟩⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩 Munted that one right up.

Structural engineer has recommended removal of this cherry tree which is quite close to the house and drains. There is a crack in some brickwork that we are monitoring. House if approx 100 years old, there was a small tree in the same place before which kept this self seeded cherry tree in check until the original tree died (I think) about 6 years ago, then the cherry tree growth exploded. On the site visit the Structural Engineer said to remove the tree. I asked if there was any risk of heave, the structural engineer said if we are worried we could do it in stages. This translated in the report to "Remove the tree in stages to reduce risk of heave" which seems more like back covering now since the initial verbal recommendation was just to remove. The more I look into it the less likely the risk of heave seems to be? If I was to remove in stages what would that look like and over what sort of timeline? Soil according to https://www.landis.org.uk/soilscapes/ is Soilscape 7: Freely draining slightly acid but base-rich soils **Texture:**Loamy **Coverage:**England: 3.1%,Wales: 3.1%,**England & Wales:**3.1% **Drainage:**Freely draining **Fertility:**High **Landcover:**Arable and grassland **Habitats:**Base-rich pastures and deciduous woodlands **Carbon:**Low **Drains to:**Groundwater **Water protection:**Groundwater contamination with nitrate; siltation and nutrient enrichment of streams from soil erosion on certain of these soils **General cropping:**Suitable for spring and autumn sown crops and grassland. Shortage of soil moisture most likely limiting factor to yields especially where stony or shallow Tomato tin can included for perspective.

How are you going to feel in a few years time when it becomes clear that Bannon, Thiel, and Farage etc..have played you like a harp?

That the place where Gates got the clap ?? Yeah I’ve heard of them, I’m not gonna do a Beth Rigby who what moment. Anyway that’s the rugby on TV now up here, in the meantime you keep heading down the rabbit holes and I’ll pop back later to see how you got on.

News. Epstein files. Sure you've heard of them. Again: Why no outrage for Rees Moggy, Johnson or Farage over the apparently successful attempt to unseat a serving PM?

🤣🤷‍♂️ Where you off to now Mark

The answer to that question is that it is indefensible. You shouldn't be taken in by strangers who promise you elixir. And should know better. Unless you are pushing an agenda, which just makes you little more than a cookie on the internet.

Chicken Jambalaya

. “The guys are trying to move on May today/tomorrow and I’m having a meeting right now” Why no outrage for Rees Moggy, Johnson or Farage over the apparently successful attempt to unseat a serving PM?

which members are raping on an industrial scale?

I have you tit, there’s no deflection Mark, not sure if you wanted more of a bite or what 🤣 If lack of answers is an indicator for spinelessness then we have a jellyfish in our midst with your wing man.

Blah blah blah, deflection when put on the spot. Why not answer Tree Fanciers post with one of the ones you generate when a muslim kills someone? Because you're spineless is the answer.

That’s ok Mark, it just reaffirms my conviction that a university education whilst an asset for some is definitely not for everyone.

I don’t nor do you or Mark. It’s the method used I find laughable. If you really want to talk about being dismissive, the silence regarding industrial scale rape by some members is worth considering.

just supposing there is some truth to it - makes sense to me. Not laughable. How can you possibly know enough about Epstein's dealings to be so dismissive?

That's @Johnsondout of the Olympic team. Just joking lad.

They do this local to where I live,

No not a wespon rather when a post is laughable it has a use. Nice of you to take an interest mind.

No not at all Mark.