Bolt

The fear of having to sleep beside a hungry woman will definitely make you a better climber....

As an aside, is there a reason why you moved on from the komet harnesses (other than them being 4 times more expensive than the little bundle of fun above). I think I still have a 1st gen Butterfly kicking about somewhere, but I stopped using it when I went over to the testicular peril of the Avao (l like to live dangerously ).

Oh, just noticed their spelling of industrial. Now that is worrying.

I know you dismissed these Mark... ....but I think it is time you properly reconsidered them. Consider the benifits... 1 More money left over for beer (other vices are available)... this will ease the crippling pain at the end of each day. 2 You could post a review in the review section (good for the forum... put something back and all that) 3 I don't think the leg adjustment will let you down ( well not before any other aspects of the harness anyway. 4 You get (as in will need to get) a new harness again in at least 6 months, so you save money on LOLER* *Unless you take a nasty fall in it beforehand.** **if you do get one, it wasn't my idea.

I gotta feelin.......

You’re back! When you admitted that your arguments were defeated yesterday morning, I thought you had conceded defeat!

Don’t suppose I could interest anyone in a bar or two of soap?

Busted. An idea that was inspired by Fight Club. Each idiotic post gets an idiotically opposite repost.

Sorry, my bad. That makes it clearer.

Oh no, White Noise....... it turns out we only gone and got ourselves the mindset of 'many migrants '. No close cultural fit for us!

A can't believe I stuck up a picture of a woman... ....what kind of a red blooded man am I ? Sorry White Noise, I feel I have let all us 'real men' down. Still, maybe I can make amends by bustin out my confederate flag, jumping in the pickup, and pumpin out some rollin coal. I'll send my woman indoors to grill up some steaks.

So, must have white skin (why is that? What difference does your skin colour make, surely there are more important characteristics for judging a person) Must be a male (should have gone without saying!) Hmmmmmmmm, could be tricky..... ..... or maybe not..... Male...... check White...... check In power in a Muslim country.... check (minister of energy and natural resources )

Oh no, Crap. She is no good..... You wanted a white man. I have gone and posted a white women. Geez, what do women know about politics.... I guess you think she should be at home to hand you cold beers and all that stuff.

Just saying... ...Minister of Labour and social security in a Muslim country...

Ooooh get me! I am just soooooo inclusive.

Me! You gotta stop using the 't' word. You have clearly given him a complex. Thought: If every time someone went on a particular forum the others posters called them a troll (to such an extent that they started to get a little fired up about it) you would think they either: A) find a more receptive forum B) improve the quality and diversity of their input. One trick ponies are only of interest for a very short time.

Apology accepted. However, I should point out that you never do anything Arbtalk related. All you usually do is bang on about how them migrants are destroying the NHS. Wrong Forum..... Puts normal peoples backs up.

Any more to add. I can keep this up all day.

My posts are long to get on you tits and deter innocent bi-standers from reading them. NHS 'robbing' Indian nurses? Well, that a turn of face. Yesterday you were the saviour of the NHS, and today you a slagging them off on a public forum. Maybe politics is not for you after all

It the problems of the NHS are financial, then that is an issue for the managers and the government, not the service users. Are you really going to keep this up for a fourth day? Didn't you have a bad enough time yesterday?

I doubt anyone will read it. It was aimed at you. You broadly claim that migrants are bad. This is a meaningless argument as the context is too broad. Just to be a dick, I go back to the beginning of history to emphasis your lazy argument. Now you have narrowed you argument to the 'work' of a single person. That is just as careless. Of course he was an unspeakable twat. Who's view is going to differ. You have gone from one extreme (all migrants - ever) to an individual! Is that the definition of an extreme view?

Stubborn? How rude. I am bloody minded, I will have you know. I have no interest in changing anyone's mind (fwiw). I just wanted to take the all fun out of peddling political propaganda on an Arboricultural forum. I think I have managed that. I am biased I know, but in my opinion, this thread, although 'active', has not gone the way the op intended. Here we are, taking the mick, and spreading ridicule. Where has the op gone?

You can't argue with him, simply because he won't answer a question. You ask a basic questions, and he replies with a statement. He may as well be a politician. Hmmmmmmmm, I wonder if he would be interested at gaining office at Tower Hamlets (although considering his earlier Tower Hamlets faux pas, I should think not).

OK, so all that genetic diversity did not float your boat... this one is far more up your alley. What have migrants ever done for the UK. #2 They saved the NHS, and made it what it is! Yep, this is going to be a shocker. Migrants SAVING the NHS!!! that can't be right. What on earth has the Daily Mail been playing at????? You can't trust anyone. Well here is my hypotheses. I have done the minimal amount of research, so you should be able to have a good smash at this! Migrant workers have been saving the NHS since 1949. That's about a year after it was founded. (I have chosen the NHS in order to 'turn your argument back in itself') Here is the logic... The NHS is publicly funded, and free at the point on use. This 'free at the point of use' idea is I think the cause of your concern for the NHS. Clearly someone cocked up right at the beginning with this concept, but luckily, migrant workers have stepped in and saved the day, right from the off. How annoying is that. Yep, right from 1949! In order to allow costs to be controlled and service provided, successive governments have recruited staff for the NHS from abroad since 1949. The details are easily available. Governments has spent millions on this as it provides a cost effective way of staffing the NHS at all levels, from bedpan emptier, to consultant surgeon. They have spent millions on recruiting overseas to not only save tens and tens of millions over the years on the wage bill, but what is more, they also fill the jobs that the 'native population' just won't do. Won't do now, wouldn't do back then. Millions, and millions and millions saved! Migrant workers have been saving the NHS since 1949. Without them there is NO WAY that the NHS could look like it currently does. That's the NHS that you hold sooooo dear. OK. That's my research done, lets go for the 'first hand experience' bit Naturally it is only the non-taxpaying migrant users of the NHS that concerns you. Are they all here for health care tourism? I wonder what the typical aliments are that they suffer? The reason I ask is that I frequent hospitals quite often (A+E and wards). Here is what I see... A+E... Lots of chavs and white trash who have got pissed up and injured themselves. Their behaviour is colourful, (but understandable due to their genetic heritage). I don't think they are net contributors to the NHS to be honest. Wards... generally white middle aged men who haven't looked after themselves, or white workers who have got injured at work. NHS Staff... all grades, the majority i think you would refer to as 'migrants'. Of the hospitals i have been in (in cities with high ethnic diversity), I really can't remember seeing that many 'migrants' lying about in beds. Maybe they are out-patients? So, there you have it. Migrants SAVING the NHS. NOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo.

OK. I respect your 3, but I have only been playing for two and a bit days. My hit-rate is right up there.