Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Pete Mctree

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    5,459
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Pete Mctree

  1. John, you can seldom see the oil being flung off the chain. If you point your saw a clean piece of paper and rev it for a few seconds you will see. If there is no oil on it then your saw is not oiling sufficiently - you can sometimes see the cloud it flings off when the sun hits it. If I put 3l of oil through a saw in a day (I often do), the saw body would be dripping with it otherwise 

    • Like 1
  2. 17 minutes ago, john87 said:

    No surprise there then.. Why on earth would anyone use cooking oil in their saw?? I have a bit to do with old motorbikes and there are always people on about what oil to use. I always tell them the same, "what ever the makers told you, your bike has lasted 70 years so far, so i think the makers might have specified the correct oil" I doubt the saw makers tell you to put cooking oil in it..

     

    Each to their own though..

     

    john..

    Did you read my previous post? 
     

    I am no longer prepared to inhale the aerosol of mineral oil or have it cover my skin. I am not a short term or hobby user & the cumulative effect is not going to be positive. I spent the first 18 years using mineral oils and I don’t miss the smell or coating on myself and my clothes.

    • Like 4
  3. 7 hours ago, scbk said:

    Just wondering, why do you use the Clark oil in the summer?

     

     

    Rapeseed has gone up in price, 20l drum was £30 something a few weeks back

    I find that the rapeseed gets too thin and does not lubricate as well when warm and I was seeing heavy wear to the bars, especially when felling 

    • Like 1
  4. I use Clark’s bio oil in the summer and plain rapeseed in winter (with exception of long bars) 

    The oil is flung off the chain in an aerosol and it not only covers bare skin, but will be inhaled too. No way will I ever use mineral oils again! 

    • Like 1
  5. 12 minutes ago, 5thelement said:

    The Forestry Contracting Association proposed something similar to this to FISA/HSE last year.
    The proposal was that prospective candidates who wanted to work in Forestry could gain employment and be mentored by the experienced employees, the two tree safe working distance would be relaxed to facilitate this.

     A log book containing the number of hours a candidate had covered on different tasks, felling, snedding, winching, hung up trees etc would be completed by the person doing the mentoring. 
    When completed the candidate would do their NPTC assessment.

    You would then have a hand cutter with possibly months on the saw before earning their tickets. 
    I mentioned it in a post on here a while back and it was rubbished, so you can’t win really.

    This kind of blueprint is the way forward imho

    13 minutes ago, Joe Newton said:

    I think perhaps the IRATA training system which requires you to have a certain number of hours supervised by a competent person before moving on to the next level could be workable

    Yes 👍😎

  6. I don’t agree on the apprenticeship to qualify, however a single week and you can climb is wrong. Fair enough get a learners ticket and then go out into the world to learn your trade and certify when your at a good standard.  Just  think about it - a qualified climber with zero day’s experience is expected to carry out an arial rescue in a stressful and new environment. It would not end well I think.

    The whole industry needs to step back and re-look at training and certification.
    The problem is that people want it cheap and quick- neither produce well trained, competent and efficient staff.

    We don’t necessarily need more, however we need far higher standards if we are to cut down on injuries and accidents.

    More paperwork won’t help, trade associations neither, just good quality training on the relevant courses and on the job. It’s not rocket science 

    • Like 4
  7. 6 minutes ago, dadio said:

    What are you smoking Pete? Cause you're spouting pure nonsense

    Simply what I was told when asked about the felling and cross cutting on the landing. This was in reference to softwoods in the PNW.

  8. 33 minutes ago, IronMike said:

    Those American videos do nowt for me, at all. The sheer state of the stumps they leave is enough for me to need to lie down in a dark room for a while 🙈🤦🏻‍♂️

    The US sawmills will not take timber with any basal flare, hence the high cuts on some trees. 

  9. 50 minutes ago, Stere said:

     

     

    I expect a 0.58 gauge bar rail is abit  more durable v 0.50 & might also carry oil better  for a longer bar?

    I don’t think it makes much difference- plenty of big saws are run on 0.50 3/8 

    • Like 1

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.