Making the news today....

[Stere]

Tories accuse Angela Rayner of Basic Instinct ploy as she 'crosses and uncrosses legs' at PMQs | Daily Mail Online

WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK

---

Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner has been mischievously accused of 'pulling a Basic Instinct' in an attempt to distract...

 

😄

[Stool master]

Unfortunately "Basic Instinct" wasn't the first thing that came to mind when this was being reported on yesterday 😖

Kenny Everett's Cupid Stunt...... it's all done in the best possible taste.

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

1 hour ago, Stool master said:

Unfortunately "Basic Instinct" wasn't the first thing that came to mind when this was being reported on yesterday 😖

Kenny Everett's Cupid Stunt...... it's all done in the best possible taste.

This might unsettle Dempsey 😂

 

He was ahead of the game with his Rayner fetish!

 

I haven’t read the story but it was being reported that Raynwr had said she was attempting to flash her legs to distract Johnson. 
 

If if was Rayner that said, and was heard to have said that, then the story has gone way off track. 
 

If she said / did this thing that might give Mr Dempsey clammy palms, then she is the only one at fault. 
 

I don’t know if she did or didn’t - if she didn’t, and it is a complete fabrication, then perhaps the misogynist howls may be appropriate, but if she did say that she had done it intentionally then she is the problem. 
 

Would be good to know one way or the other.....

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

This might unsettle Dempsey 😂

 

He was ahead of the game with his Rayner fetish!

 

I haven’t read the story but it was being reported that Raynwr had said she was attempting to flash her legs to distract Johnson. 
 

If if was Rayner that said, and was heard to have said that, then the story has gone way off track. 
 

If she said / did this thing that might give Mr Dempsey clammy palms, then she is the only one at fault. 
 

I don’t know if she did or didn’t - if she didn’t, and it is a complete fabrication, then perhaps the misogynist howls may be appropriate, but if she did say that she had done it intentionally then she is the problem. 
 

Would be good to know one way or the other.....

If a flash of Raynors legs can cause BJ to lose his concentration, I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the hookers rocked up to Lebvedev's castle. 

Truth of the matter is that he's incompetent, we all know this. 

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

If a flash of Raynors legs can cause BJ to lose his concentration, I'd love to have been a fly on the wall when the hookers rocked up to Lebvedev's castle. 

Truth of the matter is that he's incompetent, we all know this. 

A bumbling FW for sure Mark, but I fail to see how Rayner would have thought it would make the slightest of a distraction - what’s more interesting to me is whether she was overheard saying she’d employed the tactic or if it is just somebody’s’opinion’ of what they ‘thought’ she was doing....

Edited April 25, 2022 by kevinjohnsonmbe

[Mick Dempsey]

1 minute ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

A bumbling FW for sure Mark, but I fail to see how Rayner would have thought it would make the slightest of a distraction - what’s more interesting to me is whether she was overheard saying she’d employed the tactic or if it is just somebody’s’opinion’ of what they ‘thought’ she was doing....

It’s Daily Mail bullshit.

Starmer is doing ok so they’re targeting Angela Rayner.

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

55 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

It’s Daily Mail bullshit.

Starmer is doing ok so they’re targeting Angela Rayner.

You were well ahead of this one Mick 😂

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

A bumbling FW for sure Mark, but I fail to see how Rayner would have thought it would make the slightest of a distraction - what’s more interesting to me is whether she was overheard saying she’d employed the tactic or if it is just somebody’s’opinion’ of what they ‘thought’ she was doing....

She's either aware that the PM is a sex pest and capitalised on that facet of his character, or, it didn't happen. Either way it does no favours for the PM, he's either easily swayed or he's so bad that they're clutching at straws. Is my take on things. 

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

She's either aware that the PM is a sex pest and capitalised on that facet of his character, or, it didn't happen. Either way it does no favours for the PM, he's either easily swayed or he's so bad that they're clutching at straws. Is my take on things. 

I see it slightly differently- in parts at least. 
 

On the one hand the furore about misogynist behaviour would be entirely misplaced if she behaved (whether she believed it would work or not) in that fashion intentionally. 
 

On the other hand, I’d agree, it’s a poor state of affairs if she thought it would work and shows how low she holds the office of PM. 
 

That wouldn’t be a surprise though since she genuinely holds all Tories to be scum. 
 

Im of half a mind to think she’s a Machiavellian scheming bastard - I wish I didn’t feel that way.....

[Mick Dempsey]

14 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

I see it slightly differently- in parts at least. 
 

On the one hand the furore about misogynist behaviour would be entirely misplaced if she behaved (whether she believed it would work or not) in that fashion intentionally. 
 

On the other hand, I’d agree, it’s a poor state of affairs if she thought it would work and shows how low she holds the office of PM. 
 

That wouldn’t be a surprise though since she genuinely holds all Tories to be scum. 
 

Im of half a mind to think she’s a Machiavellian scheming bastard - I wish I didn’t feel that way.....

You’re missing the point Kevin.

 

It didn’t happen.