Making the news today....

[Youngstu]

17 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I’ll ask again show me where I asked BQ for any personal information. 
Here we go again down the well worn diversion won’t answer a question road. 
Keep it on topic in relation to the post you quoted. 

As Steven said, look back at your posts and his responses. 

It was blatantly obvious from an outside perspective that he didn't want to give you information that would identify himself to you, but if your colleague was in the same crew he could have done, so he was trying to appease your apparent need for proof that he was in the services without going further. 

Maybe your level of persistence and inability to read between the lines is the problem. 

[Johnsond]

12 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

As Steven said, look back at your posts and his responses. 

It was blatantly obvious from an outside perspective that he didn't want to give you information that would identify himself to you, but if your colleague was in the same crew he could have done, so he was trying to appease your apparent need for proof that he was in the services without going further. 

Maybe your level of persistence and inability to read between the lines is the problem. 

I asked for nothing more than what ships he sailed on. 
i answered his question when he asked why nothing more or less, I never said my mate might have been on the same boat at all. . At no point did I ever ask for any personal information. 
Unless you can provide evidence to the contrary. 
So as I said either one of you show me where I asked for any personal information, I’ll leave the useful to terrorist bit out as it’s just laughable. 
Never mind SP and his reluctance to disclose his employment status I’m talking about right here and now. 

Edited 8 hours ago by Johnsond

[Steven P]

8 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

I asked for nothing more than what ships he sailed on. 

 

 

OK you first then, on your overseas tours, what camps were you in, when did you serve there? 

 

(Please DO NOT answer question, your usual BS is sufficient - however I am sure in many of the countries you visited will have people interested to know that JohnsonD, living in Scotland (probs not hard to work out where exactly from your previous obsessions either) was there shooting at them... perhaps make it relevant to your situation is the only way to make you understand online security?)

[Oldfeller]

"Never a giant octopus around when ya feckin' need one"

[Johnsond]

@Steven P@Youngstu

This is not rocket science guys. You’ve both been asked a simple question. 
Stop the diversion BS and let’s have the evidence. 
You both jumped in on a post not directed at either of you, you both made incorrect assumptions and then posted it as though it were fact. Now the pair of you are struggling big time to provide the evidence because there isn’t any. 
Prove me wrong 

Edited 7 hours ago by Johnsond

[Steven P]

are you.... refusing to divulge your personal information there? Not wanting to tell us where you served, what tours you did, years you were in certain countries, which native you shot at and so on? Of all the people on here, and in the interests of your credibility I thought you would be popping that all on an arb forum for the world to know all your background... much like the information you demand from others... go on, fess up.

 

Lesson over for today in internet personal security.

 

Now back to the arb work you have been doing this week, pop up a photo Johnson D'Senior Dating.

[Johnsond]

The diversion and BS never stops does it lad. 
Neither one of you can answer the question or provide the answers. 
You have both been caught out for making up shit at best or lying at worst. 
Ships you served in is not personal information. 

You can play your games as much as you want fool but it’s obvious to anyone here reading the posts that I did not ask him for anything that would be classed as “ personal information “ if you had the proof you’d be banging it up in an instant. 

Arb work 😂😂😂😂says the man who won’t even admit what he does for a living or ever puts any pics up. 
I’ll be milling next week I’ll maybe put a pic or two up but currently chilling on way back to uk in Barbados you sad little man. 

[Youngstu]

4 hours ago, Johnsond said:

I asked for nothing more than what ships he sailed on. 
i answered his question when he asked why nothing more or less, I never said my mate might have been on the same boat at all. . At no point did I ever ask for any personal information. 
Unless you can provide evidence to the contrary. 
So as I said either one of you show me where I asked for any personal information, I’ll leave the useful to terrorist bit out as it’s just laughable. 
Never mind SP and his reluctance to disclose his employment status I’m talking about right here and now. 

1)You ask a question which comes across as a loaded question (and you have form on that type of thing). 

2)He gives you an answer/response that should put the apparent nature of your question to bed.

3)You ask more questions to try and get more information (which could come across as trying to find more specific information, or alternatively common ground following earlier antagonistic conversations)

4)He gives you responses that indicate that he has no interest in giving you the answers you want. 

5)You get all grumpy with his responses

6)Others try to point out what has happened 

7)You argue your point and ask others to prove you wrong (never an easy thing when the vast majority of your posts are edited at one point or another), but in this case it wasn't about a clear statement/question which you did or didn't ask, but implication of what was asked and responses.

 

and so it goes on and on and on. 

 

Maybe get off the sun lounger, go and put your phone in your room and pick up a book or have a walk or swim, surely any of those are more relaxing then arguing with random anonymous people on here. 

[Johnsond]

10 minutes ago, Youngstu said:

1)You ask a question which comes across as a loaded question (and you have form on that type of thing). 

2)He gives you an answer/response that should put the apparent nature of your question to bed.

3)You ask more questions to try and get more information (which could come across as trying to find more specific information, or alternatively common ground following earlier antagonistic conversations)

4)He gives you responses that indicate that he has no interest in giving you the answers you want. 

5)You get all grumpy with his responses

6)Others try to point out what has happened 

7)You argue your point and ask others to prove you wrong (never an easy thing when the vast majority of your posts are edited at one point or another), but in this case it wasn't about a clear statement/question which you did or didn't ask, but implication of what was asked and responses.

 

and so it goes on and on and on. 

 

Maybe get off the sun lounger, go and put your phone in your room and pick up a book or have a walk or swim, surely any of those are more relaxing then arguing with random anonymous people on here. 

Put up the evidence to back up your post. Not just your incorrect assumptions that got you here in the first place. 
Dobe the swim thing already. 

 

[Steven P]

Feck sake, go to primary school, tell the teacher there that you have absolutely no comprehension of the written word and ask to be taught to the level of a 7 year old. When you are able to understand come back to the internet of adults with an ability to take part in the conversation and an understanding of the written world.