Making the news today....

[Johnsond]

6 minutes ago, Mark J said:

'Private life' errors can and do affect the professional capacity of a person. I'm sure you know that.

You're never going to be a deer stalker if you've been jailed for armed robbery.

 

As mentioned previously Mark as long as it isn’t illegal 

Well if you are waiting for a squeaky clean holier than thou politician to come along with zero history or character flaws to occupy 10 Downing st then good luck. 
You have more chance of finding a virgin bride up the big market on a weekend. 

[Mark J]

14 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

As mentioned previously Mark as long as it isn’t illegal 

 

Like lying to the queen or breaking legislation during covid illegal? Or just historical illegality of the wrong kind? 

Edited September 6, 2022 by Mark J

[Johnsond]

1 minute ago, Mark J said:

Like lying to the queen or breaking legislation during covid illegal?

Ok are we now back to Boris, “ he’s out now isnt he .” I thought it was about whom (😂) would want the job not whom (😂) used to have it, now if you want a totally different level of bullshit stupidity to chat about I’ll easy swap to covid legislation and killing granny etc 

I didn’t realise you were a royalist nowadays. 

[Mark J]

45 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Ok are we now back to Boris, “ he’s out now isnt he .” I thought it was about whom (😂) would want the job not whom (😂) used to have it, now if you want a totally different level of bullshit stupidity to chat about I’ll easy swap to covid legislation and killing granny etc 

I didn’t realise you were a royalist nowadays. 

Aye, It's actually "who", I know that you don't get the nuance so go with the 'catch all', fair enough, I can't be arsed teaching English for free.

Ha, Liz Truss, when she was a Lib Dem wanted to abolish the monarchy, I wonder if she mentioned that to her maj today.

What made you think I wasn't a fan of the paedophiliac ridden family that are the royals?

Edited September 6, 2022 by Mark J

[Johnsond]

33 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Aye, It's actually 'who", I know that you don't get the nuance so go with the 'catch all', fair enough, I can't be arsed teaching English for free.

Ha, Liz Truss, when she was a Lib Dem wanted to abolish the monarchy, I wonder if she mentioned that to her maj today.

What made you think I wasn't a fan of the paedophiliac ridden family that are the royals?

Lol 😌👍result eh you and Dempsey both biting now eh the queens of grammar, and I’m ok for English tuition eh, You are scraping the barrel a bit Mark. Exactly as I said earlier whom or who ( I’ll let you bitches grind your teeth) would want the job, as  you’ve just pointed out your every past word is scrutinised ie Truss and the Monarchy comment that you’ve just made. 

[Mark J]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Lol 😌👍result eh you and Dempsey both biting now eh the queens of grammar, and I’m ok for English tuition eh, You are scraping the barrel a bit Mark. Exactly as I said earlier whom or who ( I’ll let you bitches grind your teeth) would want the job, as  you’ve just pointed out your every past word is scrutinised ie Truss and the Monarchy comment that you’ve just made. 

Do you think it's a bad thing for our "elected" politicians to be held to account - Liz Truss got 47% of the vote of the tory membership, that's not a lot of support in real terms. If you don't want the scrutiny then perhaps having a shady past where you'll say whatever makes you the most popular person in the room should render you incapable of being an MP. 

 

[Mark J]

 

[Johnsond]

7 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Do you think it's a bad thing for our "elected" politicians to be held to account - Liz Truss got 47% of the vote of the tory membership, that's not a lot of support in real terms. If you don't want the scrutiny then perhaps having a shady past where you'll say whatever makes you the most popular person in the room should render you incapable of being an MP. 

 

Who said they should not be scrutinised?? 
They absolutely should be held to account in regards their performance whilst carrying out the role in question. 
Right at the start of me replying to your post and basically lamenting at the current state of things I said the level of scrutiny and tactics involved  are not helping things. You and Dempsey both resorted to trying to be smart arses about minor grammatical errors ( normally a last resort ) and  totally running off at different tangents. Anyway it’s good to see your  university education being put to good use pointing out such things. 

[Mark J]

27 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Who said they should not be scrutinised?? 
They absolutely should be held to account in regards their performance whilst carrying out the role in question. 
Right at the start of me replying to your post and basically lamenting at the current state of things I said the level of scrutiny and tactics involved  are not helping things. You and Dempsey both resorted to trying to be smart arses about minor grammatical errors ( normally a last resort ) and  totally running off at different tangents. Anyway it’s good to see your  university education being put to good use pointing out such things. 

"Running off at different tangents" is how meaningful things occur.

I paid for my education myself and got what I deserved.
 

[eggsarascal]

It’s just been reported that BJ dislocated his shoulder while patting himself on the back during his departure speech today.