Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Husky 266se/sg


flatyre
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

hey folks has anyone ever owned one of these? I know they're old but are they still usable, been offered one for £60 but it needs a side casing, read a few mixed reviews, would it be worth buying a sourcing a casing?

 

Not owned but worked on …

Basically its a slightly slower running but same cc version of the 266 xp mentioned above. I cross cut some ash with it for a tank..feels good to use and is no slouch in standard clothes . I would snap it up if you don't mind trawling for parts as and when needed.:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All 266 machines were either se or sg ( heated handle ) it replaced the 162, both were very good machines, well worth the money as long as it does not need a shed load of parts, most parts are readily available, watch the rubber av mounts, they perish and will probably require replacing, fit the later knee link chain brake, they are still available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All 266 machines were either se or sg ( heated handle ) it replaced the 162, both were very good machines, well worth the money as long as it does not need a shed load of parts, most parts are readily available, watch the rubber av mounts, they perish and will probably require replacing, fit the later knee link chain brake, they are still available.

I stand corrected..was under the misconception the 266xp was a bit faster under load speed than the 266 se …didn't realise they were effectively the same spec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
hey folks has anyone ever owned one of these? I know they're old but are they still usable, been offered one for £60 but it needs a side casing, read a few mixed reviews, would it be worth buying a sourcing a casing?

 

I had the same problem But sourced one from the states can't wait to use it now :thumbup::thumbup:

image.jpg.749544890f235a1f0be70bd49f1077a8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stand corrected..was under the misconception the 266xp was a bit faster under load speed than the 266 se …didn't realise they were effectively the same spec.

 

There will be no difference in power (caused by design) between a late 266se and a 266xp - but the early (up to some time in 1985) se saws had a smaller carb, and slightly less power.

 

As with virtually every model, there were other changes as well during production, but I don't know of a single one that happened at the same time as the designation/labels change.

Edited by SawTroll
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.