Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just would like people's opinion on a couple of points pls.

 

1. Are wife beaters (vests) acceptable as part of a uniform ?

 

2. Should ground staff be wearing hi vis at all times or just when on roads ?

 

 

 

Ta

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

IMHO:

 

1. No. To some customers they might seen too casual (beach wear), and may not reflect the required image.

2. Yes. If doing a comprehensive (proper??) risk assessment, then ALARP would dictate so.

Posted

I don't feel that vests portray a good image, but thats just my opinion.

 

I have hi vis for me and my subbies, sign writen for that extra bit of advertising, and a professional look.

 

It helps when working too imo, as its easier to identify groundies when in a drop zone etc.

 

I got some hi vis polo shirts done and they are very cool to work in, they are a non absorbent type. from Printed Hi Vis Polo Shirt

Posted

Vests are a no go man, unless you want to look like a gypsy. I wear navy polo shirts embroidered and printed, hi vis vests if required.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk mobile app

Posted
I don't feel that vests portray a good image, but thats just my opinion.

 

 

 

I have hi vis for me and my subbies, sign writen for that extra bit of advertising, and a professional look.

 

 

 

It helps when working too imo, as its easier to identify groundies when in a drop zone etc.

 

 

 

I got some hi vis polo shirts done and they are very cool to work in, they are a non absorbent type. from Printed Hi Vis Polo Shirt

 

 

Yeah, we've got hi vis polo's but they're dogpoo in the comfort dept and the boys wear vests underneath then take the polo's off 1st opportunity. Will have to look see if yours are better.

 

Have ordered some bright printed vests, will see how that goes

Posted
IMHO:

 

1. No. To some customers they might seen too casual (beach wear), and may not reflect the required image.

2. Yes. If doing a comprehensive (proper??) risk assessment, then ALARP would dictate so.

 

 

Alarp ???

Posted (edited)
Alarp ???

 

Its safetyspeak for as low as reasonably practical

 

What the term should be in this case

 

SFAIRP so far as is reasonably practicable

Edited by treequip

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.