Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Banned drivers


danroker1987
 Share

Recommended Posts

now with insurance you have to be named on the policy to drive other vehicals. the third party rules does not apply anymore. so if your name is not on that policy you are not insured to drive it.

 

 

 

You can be covered third party only driving other vehicles with the owners permission, subject to the other vehicle having insurance of it's own. It's on my policy and plenty of other peoples.

 

You can't buy a Porche and a Robin Reliant, and only insure the Reliant. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When I sell off our old vans people turn up with their car insurance expecting to test drive the vehicle.

 

1. a car policy does not cover a commercial vehicle ( van )

 

2. Even if it did your not driving my vehicle 3rd party fire and theft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I sell off our old vans people turn up with their car insurance expecting to test drive the vehicle.

 

1. a car policy does not cover a commercial vehicle ( van )

 

2. Even if it did your not driving my vehicle 3rd party fire and theft

 

A car policy can cover a van not being used for commercial purposes, I was covered by the Co-op when I had my Nissan Vanette for my own use camping and pushbike carrying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fines are dispensed in accordance with the tariff of punishment.

 

It sets out the minimum and maximum punishment for the offence.

 

For the plebeian, your brief can whinge that you don't have a lot of disposable income and that a heavy fine would be difficult to pay, that cant be said of the footballers so they get the top end of the tariff. The courts don't get involved with financially auditing each and every drink driving defendant but the sentencing guidelines say they do have to take the severity into account.

 

To take your example of Mr Smith lets say the fine is £100.00 and he earns £400.00 a week, that makes the fine a quarter of his weekly. Rooney earns 329,851.00 a week and a quarter of that is over 82 grand, that's hardly a means tested fine

 

What looks like means testing is the guilty as sin whinging that they cant pay even tough they are bang to rights.

 

Mr Smith down the road earns £11,000 a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.