Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

200year old cedar in Dorset..


Rebel_Commando
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Paul, great addition to the thread.

 

Very interesting in that such a high profile British Arb has taken this unique & instantaneous way to tackle the decision to remove this tree.

 

I take my hat off to Mr Barrell, and to be honest have learnt something new about his interest in heritage trees.

 

Should never judge a book I suppose.

 

I guess cynics will find his personal experience with the cedar gives a biased view of the situation.

But personally I believe that ownership and working historical knowledge of a tree should (where ever possible) be sought when a report of a tree is commissioned.

 

This has been one of the most fascinating threads (from my perspective) that has been posted here for a while (interestingly unposed at uktc by Mr Barrells peers)

 

I think this has the potential to have lasting repercussions on how similar heritage trees will be managed in the future.

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having looked after a considerable number of veteran trees and spent a good number of years having them surveyed. I would not have done anything different.

 

If the surveyors, and there were four of them working as a team, report had landed on my desk with 'fell' written upon it, that is what would have happened.

 

The NT risk/survey would have,as has been reported, done exactly the same.

 

I am still hunting for the pictures of a similar aged & sized cedar that crushed several cars in the past gales. Not that it was unsound but they are very well known to be hopeless in winds being so very brittle.

 

The insurers would have had a field day if I'd said...'oh it's an interesting tree, lets ignore the report!' How many folk would have stood up to be counted to leave it standing? Realistically, no one!

codlasher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having looked after a considerable number of veteran trees and spent a good number of years having them surveyed. I would not have done anything different.

 

If the surveyors, and there were four of them working as a team, report had landed on my desk with 'fell' written upon it, that is what would have happened.

 

The NT risk/survey would have,as has been reported, done exactly the same.

 

I am still hunting for the pictures of a similar aged & sized cedar that crushed several cars in the past gales. Not that it was unsound but they are very well known to be hopeless in winds being so very brittle.

 

The insurers would have had a field day if I'd said...'oh it's an interesting tree, lets ignore the report!' How many folk would have stood up to be counted to leave it standing? Realistically, no one!

codlasher

 

You should probably watch the video. They NT went against the advice of the report which said "roots are pucka, trees a goodn".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the cedar mentioned as falling and crushing. It took two weeks to move it all to the sawmill where it was broken down into pieces small enough to fit the saws. It was planked into stock and put in a barn, under cover for a year or so.

This stock was then turned into ten doors, four walls of panelling, several hundred yards of skirting, architrave and other joinery pieces.

All this timber still lays in a beautiful Chilterns property. The panelling has had an interesting history but is still in the room for where it was built similar the doors and finishes. A couple of famous people have lived and enjoyed the timber too so there is a happy, in my opinion, ending to trees such as this...

I still have a little table and a couple of boards. The table is nowhere as nice as some of the pieces that are made by folk on this forum, se7enthdevil for one....and my farms name sign is another piece so will outlast me!

codlasher.

Edited by codlasher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no tree hugger, I have felled loads of big trees, some much older than that one. However, felling that is a disgrace, the tree appears to be surrounded by grass, with a road near by, surely either moving the target or some veteran tree pruning would have sufficed. What is impressive about trees like these is their girth not their height, heavy pruning, halfing that tree if necessary would have reduced the wind sail to such an extent that it could probably have kept going indefinitely.

 

Very poor tree management IMO, whats worse it comes from a heritage organisation, if the NT can't get it right who can?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.