I made an error, time for a correction!

[peatff]

We tolerate a lot of stink Tony, if we didn't, it would be a real quite house

.

 

I thought it was a bit of a breach of rule 4.

 

4. No attacks, insults, or flames** - be it on someone's person, religious beliefs, race, national background, sexual orientation, or whatever. This is VERY important. If you have a problem with somebody, do not flame them on our website. Take it somewhere else. No flaming of ANY kind is welcome here.

 

Nowt to do with me though and I did think it was funny

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

We tolerate a lot of stink Tony, if we didn't, it would be a real quite house

 

 

 

 

.

 

on the contrary, it is or will become MORE quiet as anyone with any self respect will gradually drift away from the site, or worse never get involved past a lurker because of such responses.

[David Humphries]

on the contrary, it is or will become MORE quiet as anyone with any self respect will gradually drift away from the site, or worse never get involved past a lurker because of such responses.

 

 

So the site and it's owner being awarded at conference by the Arboricultural Association for their "outstanding and continuous contribution to Arboriculture" fits in with your statement how exactly?

 

 

 

 

Happy Christmas Tony

 

.

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

This one goes out to........... well nuff said!

 

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMEe7JqBgvg]Internet Bridge Troll - YouTube[/ame]

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

So the site and it's owner being awarded at conference by the Arboricultural Association for their "outstanding and continuous contribution to Arboriculture" fits in with your statement how exactly?

 

 

 

 

Happy Christmas Tony

 

.

 

 

I did not suggest anything about the contribution the forum makes overall, only that there appears to be at times a "selective hearing" type of scenario.

 

Try not to twist it all out of shape and stick to what i Said, dont manipulate it, it is what it is, and aint what it aint, which you say was implying the site was less than an outstanding contribution.

 

I am not accusing the SITE of anything, only the mods of choosing NOT to do their jobs and uphold the sites Rules and regulations which all have signed up for.

 

This has finally been addressed, the reasons for doing so 99% likely due to the very quote in my statement, that if it continues credibility will be lost, rather than acknowledge the truth in that statement, a suggestion that something is to the FORUMS detriment, youve twisted it to be an attack on the forum.

 

Happy New year:biggrin:

[Steve Bullman]

This issue has been resolved already...posting that video to revive this dying thread, you are just trying to goad 'you know who' into action. You are the troll in this instance Tony.

 

Thread closed

Edited February 15, 2014 by Steve Bullman