Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

maggie thatcher


ging
 Share

Recommended Posts

totally right Geoff. She was a true 'leader', whatever you think of her politics and deserves some respect because of it. If you think that Britain would be a better country if Michael Foote had been the PM instead...well...keep taking the tablets....

 

I was a Londoner until I moved to Yorkshire, she did wonders for the industry and working class up here. No lack of respect to her, or anyone else intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 537
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Seems the only ppl that didn't like her where from the mining community?

 

She had the british interest and pride at heart and it was a much better place than it is now. The economy was a much better place.

 

So lets take Arthur Scargil, thrown out the NMU in the end by the members, claimed tax in the expenses row for a flat that didn't exist, helped reduce a sentence on a murderer down to 8 years imprisonment....

 

I think your mistaken mate, she stripped the heavy industry out of this country,now we are just one big call center, don't think she popular anywhere where old industries have been shut down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thinking... we would not be here today, running a Tree Surgery & Firewood business on our own property in Northumberland if it had not been possible to get on the property ladder in 80's by buying our council house! RIP Maggie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She let my mum buy her council house that further allowed her to climb the housing ladder she nows lives a retired life in a nice single storey cottage in the market town of Richmond North Yorkshire

Her mortgage is paid up which has got to be a better thing than the now in government having to pay her rent if she hadn't bought ......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its the governments job to do so.

 

It's also the governments job to act on the intelligence they receive, in a timely manner, to forestall a crisis. The Falkland islanders pleaded for an increased presence by the British Navy well before they were invaded.

 

Our own intelligence services, I believe, were also advocating this and advising our government that the military junta, being so unpopular at the time, were looking to deflect the population away from the economic crisis they were suffering.

 

There were no winners or losers in that conflict, apart from the islanders who stayed British, too many died, IMO unnecessarily.

 

I also hold no political alliance to any party and don't particularly want to continue in this thread. I simply can't justify glorifying showing the argies a thing or two:001_tt2::001_tt2:

 

Me neither,(glorifying etc),but you stuck your tounge out too early mate,you never directly answered the question.:bootyshake::laugh1:

 

Sorry, thought my first sentence answered your question. I concur that in time of conflict it's their position to do so. But don't forget, war is only the failure of diplomacy. (Or the result of not showing your bigger stick)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, thought my first sentence answered your question. I concur that in time of conflict it's their position to do so. But don't forget, war is only the failure of diplomacy. (Or the result of not showing your bigger stick)

 

Now that I agree with,trouble is it takes two to make/keep peace.:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on Dave, the first election was on the back of the winter of discontent and a Callaghan government that couldn't keep the lights on, the second was on the backs of the servicemen who won the Falklands back. You could have got a chimp elected on either ticket.

 

Oh yes and then her own party booted her out because she was a sure fire looser for the next one

 

One of the main reasons they got rid of her (and she did not even loose that vote) was because she wanted less connection with Europe, but the the rest of the party wanted to get more into the EU, I think many would say she was right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.