Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

If as the op said, they have adopted the English model I wouldn't be overly concerned, it will mean that the authority can levy fees, they can be quite lumpy and I can't see that going far in the land of the frugal:laugh1:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Would the local authority have any choice, if all the criteria had been met and found to be applicable?

 

I'd imagine (in the hypothetical & unlikely case as with this hedge) a never ending trail of review & appeals would be the outcome for the Scottish Ministers to deal with.

 

 

.

Posted
I'd imagine (in the hypothetical & unlikely case as with this hedge) a never ending trail of review & appeals would be the outcome for the Scottish Ministers to deal with.

 

 

.

 

good, let them reap what they sowed.:lol::lol::lol:

Posted

I know I am clutching at straws and being a little ridiculous but am trying to find any ways there might be to counter this , what seems to me , stupid law . I don't live in Scotland but it does seem to me to be complex and at the same time daft .

Posted
This will get interesting. When the first LPA tree officer decides that two mature beech can't be reduced to whatever height the formula decrees, what are the options?

 

The aggrieved neighbour then takes the council to court for not applying the law? I think this may keep lawyers and courts busy for a while.

 

You have got straight to the practical difficulty. You won't be surprised to know that the Tree Officers Association was against the inclusion of deciduous trees.

Posted
I'd be very surprised if an application would be approved for the cutting of world record holder and tourist attraction.

 

But I get your point.

 

 

 

.

 

I couldn't resist looking it up on a satellite image, no-one lives in teh shadow of this particular hedge. But it doesn't have to be a managed hedge since a hedge can also be a line of trees ona boundary, unmanaged or at least not formally trimmed to a face. These are the trees I fear for.

Posted
So what about the Bird nesting part of the law . say for example there were 2 or more trees in a row ( constituting a Scottish hedge ) all containing a rookery in the crown ?

 

I believe the Council will be able to specify when the reduction is done, so nesting and breaches of the Wildlife & Countryside Act can be avoided. As a precaution I suppose Councils will always specify cutting out of nesting season for conifers.

Posted

Ahh Mr Blair, the first to point out that it is bonanza time for tree cutters all over the country! I of course will try and get my fair share of that work. I am more disgusted witht teh lack of thought and the politicising that went in to this shabby law.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.