Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

One or two ?


Mick Stockbridge
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ive been asked to take down this Cherry. Its very close to a house and I would like some opinions please as to whether it should be removed in one or spread out over a few years to avoid heave. My instincts tell me to do it in two stages over a three or four year period. I would like to know other peoples opinions please.

007.jpg.c9f8daa1cbe4f0946ddcfe060c974b60.jpg

005.jpg.2fefef6fdbaafd6f3a3adb7afa50409e.jpg

003.jpg.5e83ed1ec40acdcab52911e0ea212e71.jpg

002.jpg.9af32b2bc62ea98adc1ff67e20b6ed0a.jpg

001.jpg.e53d4b44c938937c4477901211145b77.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I would whap it straight down Mick.

 

Foundations should be down to solid stuff if the house was built right, if it's modern and on clay it should be on a raft foundation.

 

Imo if the building was susceptable to heave, it would have done so in the past with droughts, wet spells and tree winter dormancy. :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi mick. i have never heard of taking down trees in stages to avoid heave, i dont even know what heave is. someone mentioned it the other day. if its cherry than the surface roots will be causing damage by now anyway. so i would say get it down and let someone sort the root problem. imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, soil types, drainage routes, recent hard works ? But staging its removal, bit pointless relly. Heave may not even happen RE the previous stuff. I'd go for the whole lot out +stump grind. Get a disclaimer written in the job quote tho'

 

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All in one go.

 

How old is the house?

 

Anything since 1995 should have been built in accordance with NHBC 4.2 standards and should (theoretically!) be immune to heave. (Ha ha)

 

1970,s according to the owner of the tree. The tree is in the garden next door and was there before the house, which I am lead to believe has some bearing on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The soil type will determind whether the soil changes in volume during wetting and drying. If the soil re-hydrates and expands after the felling(possibly resulting in heave), the soil will still reach the same volume once the tree is gone regardless of how quickly or slowly its removed.

 

At least that is how I interpret the information I have read. As far as I am aware staged felling is a redundant theory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.