Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Potential ANCIENT tree removal


Ross Smith
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for creating a very interesting thread Ross.

I do not envy you one bit in looking to decide how to deal with this situation.

Reading some of the replies in this thread reminds me of just how little i know, but your last comment,

I've never cut a piece of wood as hard as this
is interesting; with hindsight, had you the opportunity to have carried out a Picus or Resistograph test do you think this may have produced results making retention any more of a possibility?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross you mentioned about the hardness of the wood...

 

I did a road side Beech today with Merip, no where near the size of the job you had. Also some interesting patterns in the wood.

 

I commented to one of the guys it was like concrete when the splitting mall impacted.

 

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1354828558.095776.jpg.77c1da32bd3288f92fa89a4edbc1c082.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1354828578.687461.jpg.9d3c8010ecdb6efe516edd1a1dcd1c86.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me I think the hardness of the wood with the that the tree was over 350 yrs and had so much callous growth here their and everywhere within its lifetime but yes also the infected wood was surprisingly tough and to answer your question about keeping the tree with what I've seen throughout the dismantle is still a tough question, a big part of me wants to say yes because of the healthy appearance of the canopy and strength within 90% of the timber removed but reality and facts told me the tree was potentially vulnerable to complete failure considering the nature of how quick the fungus attacks the root and heartwood of the tree.

It was a tough job from start to finish and hopefully I will never take a tree of this age down again, although I'm starting a bigger beech next week that has merip but is probably 150yrs younger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.