Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Ash dieback fungus


baz
 Share

Recommended Posts

It does ... And will evolve to beat it but it takes time ... Aparently Chinese horse chestnut is immune to the whole bleeding canker gig as it was present in china thousands of years ago.. I do know of a few large elm woods that seem to be thriving above the normal crappy hedge row die back you see or so I hope ! I'm only going in what I have been told and my observations on that so feel free to shoot it down..

As for the ash it is an absolute tradgidy ... I live in a village called Ashwell , ash around the well and that is all that grows here apart from elm .. Would be devistating and makes me feel really depressed thinking of the out come to how my childhood country side would change to with out the ash In it..

 

we almost daily take out horse chestnuts here in milton keynes with bleeding canker.. its a shame as there were so many planted 20 odd years ago. id love to learn abit more about pests and dieases. is there such thing as a day coarse on the itroduction to pests and deiseses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry to go back to elm but are you saying that as it suckers then the tree doesn't evolve (as in distribute new seed for new trees). Surely elm must spread somehow. Not challenging, just trying to understand. Controlling ded has not worked so now we must just wait until the species can beat it through evolution. As it thrives as a hedgerow tree then I thought there was some hope this might happen in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to go back to elm but are you saying that as it suckers then the tree doesn't evolve (as in distribute new seed for new trees). Surely elm must spread somehow. Not challenging, just trying to understand. Controlling ded has not worked so now we must just wait until the species can beat it through evolution. As it thrives as a hedgerow tree then I thought there was some hope this might happen in the future.

 

 

That's as I understand it, it doesn't grow from seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This Chalara is here, its not going to be restricted by the actions of man, we would be wise to only fell the dead ones and allow those that have some natural resistance to survive rather than cull them all in a sterilization process which is futile.

 

Another british icon that will be confined to rarity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to go back to elm but are you saying that as it suckers then the tree doesn't evolve (as in distribute new seed for new trees). Surely elm must spread somehow. Not challenging, just trying to understand. Controlling ded has not worked so now we must just wait until the species can beat it through evolution. As it thrives as a hedgerow tree then I thought there was some hope this might happen in the future.

 

Yes, the english elm (procera) was reckoned to be a hybrid that didn't set viable seed. Probably selected because of the straight stems it produced. Thus it's DNA didn't change and it spread by man and vegetative suckering.

 

It was the combination of the yeast like fungus (Ceratocystis ulmi then but since renamed OPH??? novo ulmi), the vector ( scolytus beetle) and the high dependance of the tree on the current year's vessels to carry water to the crown that cause the tree to kill itself as it reacted to the fungus with tyloses filling the vessels.

 

If you remove one of these, the ability of the beetle to lay eggs in the phloem because it is too narrow, as in a <25 year old tree, then the stem doesn't get re infected. Whether coppicing all susceptible elms would eventually kill off the fungus I don't know but I think it is a viable way of continuing an english elm population.

 

This chalara fraxinea appears to be a wind born fungus so not much holding it in a naive ash population, some ash may have resistant dna and these would eventually re colonise.

 

Elms were a big portion of the hedgerow trees in Surrey, a lot had died from a less virulent form of the disease in 1927 but large individual isolated trees were common in my teens plus the may 60 cms dbh 15 m tall regrowth from the earlier infection.

Edited by Andy Collins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the english elm (procera) was reckoned to be a hybrid that didn't set viable seed. Probably selected because of the straight stems it produced. Thus it's DNA didn't change and it spread by man and vegetative suckering.

 

It was the combination of the yeast like fungus (Ceratocystis ulmi then but since renamed OPH??? novo ulmi), the vector ( scolytus beetle) and the high dependance of the tree on the current year's vessels to carry water to the crown that cause the tree to kill itself as it reacted to the fungus with tyloses filling the vessels.

 

If you remove one of these, the ability of the beetle to lay eggs in the phloem because it is too narrow, as in a <25 year old tree, then the stem doesn't get re infected. Whether coppicing all susceptible elms would eventually kill off the fungus I don't know but I think it is a viable way of continuing an english elm population.

 

This chalara fraxinea appears to be a wind born virus so not much holding it in a naive ash population, some ash may have resistant dna and these would eventually re colonise.

 

Elms were a big portion of the hedgerow trees in Surrey, a lot had died from a less virulent form of the disease in 1927 but large individual isolated trees were common in my teens plus the may 60 cms dbh 15 m tall regrowth from the earlier infection.

 

I would like to try and find an endophyte that we could innoculate the elm scrubs with that can outstrip the mycelium of novostoma :thumbup1:

 

if wecould breed it with P ostreatus and form a super hybrid capable of producing the nematode paralyzing toxin ostratin we would be onto a winner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tend to go with Andy on this.

 

We have played around too much without understanding fully what we are getting into, resulting in man made problems further down the road. Its tempting to jump in and have a go at sorting problems out, but what we should be doing is sitting back, watching and learning.

 

I suspect elms are working the problem as we speak.

What we need to accept is that nature's time scale does not necessarily tie in with ours. Nature takes in a much longer view of things where as we rush around wanting everything to happen instantaneously.

 

More haste, less speed

Slow brewed, extra matured ya-da ya-da

 

No sure who said it first, but something along the lines of 'the more I learn the less I realise I know.

Human beings need to wind their necks in and show some humility and respect

Curiosity is a fine attribute, but it is also dangerously tempting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.