Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do you run a 360 for harvesting, thinking of having a 360 converted for thinning work, what size and make of digger do you use? What head and who did the conversion and with hind sight would you change anything? plus what sort of tonnage a day do you manage? Cheers Mark. :thumbup:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

8 tonne would be the smallest but reach wouldn't be good. Bigger machines say 20 odd tonnes would be better. Logmax head would be my choice. I'd have an extension boom put on for extra reach as well.

 

Purpose built machines are much better than their digger converted counterparts. Not sure what the cost of a s/h base unit would be compared to a converted digger. I'd of thought the guarding pump and cooling upgrades would be expensive. I was doing 8 tonne/h in Finland which was a little under what a pro would do (10ish/h).

Posted

I have purpose built but am thinking of 360 for smaller work but can't bring myself to go back to tracks or the reduction in oil flow that i have now I think if I did it would be a doosan or cat 13 ton zero tail swing with keto 150 good simple head but don't like the fact I loose so much reach so think it would be better to make larger machines narrower and keep the 10 m reach maybe fit smaller head not sure which way to go any suggestions ??? Anybody got smaller head for sale ?? 30-40 cm size

Posted

Keto is a good head I had one years ago a good alrounder but I think if you are doing reasonable stuff you get more speed for your oil flow out of rollers instead of tracks 3 knife keto excellent on hardwood

Posted

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9khVnOC3qE]Hyundai R145 with Keto 150 Harvester - YouTube[/ame]

 

Logsdails Hyundai R145LCR with Keto head

They are really pleased with it and the oil flow on the base unit is far better than any other make apparently.

Posted

I think wilsons were promoting the ‘harvadig’ at the last APF and since then in various magazines, quick conversion of digger to harvester and back , choice of base machine and high enough oil flow to power the head being the important factor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.