Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

To Coronet or Not to Coronet, now that is a question


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

well to be honest the wholle yank thing is just a wind up, on a serious note there is now considerable evidence that the native americans were indeed VERY capable foresters.

 

In a talk i heard Dr lee klinger mention something about shells as fertiliser 300 miles inland on a archeo dig amoungst other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a talk i heard Dr lee klinger mention something about shells as fertiliser 300 miles inland on a archeo dig amoungst other stuff.

 

 

 

Klinger is a dude, really enjoyed his presentation, and found the whole moss climax theory very interesting.

 

Spoke to him about whether any snags were being left in the clear fell for Habitat.

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing i like about Dr klinger is his "inbuilt" eye of ecological, geological time, he has that rare gift of seeing beyond the scope of mortal man, he sees the proscesses through time as though he was an imortal. i think that requires a sense of the total irelavance and superfluos nature of the human organism!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hamadryad, I agree whole heartedly with your post regarding the importance of sharing ideas with clients...this is an excellent thread with very thought provoking ideas being put out there and discussed.

 

To qoute Neville Fay in a recent(ish) email....

 

"A key conservation arboriculture objective is therefore that there should be ‘no avoidable loss of veteran and ancient trees’. Given that mature trees are the veteran and ancients of tomorrow, this objective extends to the management of the younger, mature cohort (important also for its contribution to ecosystem services, including urban climate control).......When is intervention appropriate? This would depend on the objectives of the client, also hopefully informed by the CA professionals’ expertise and advice. Intervention needs to consider time and priority, (if it is necessary at all, if so, how soon and how long can it reasonably be put off?), whether any intervention with the above ground tree / parts can be avoided (can intervention relating to health or stress remediation be confined to the root-soil system, mitigating rhyzosphere condition, again when and how long and how little)."

 

 

Really love your signature line from Alan Rayner..great stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Klinger is a dude, really enjoyed his presentation, and found the whole moss climax theory very interesting.

 

Spoke to him about whether any snags were being left in the clear fell for Habitat.

 

 

 

.

 

That prosces of "succsesion" he talks of is something we need to look at as part of our overall forestry/woodland managment plans.

 

it is natures way, to go on and change through time scales few people can comprehend, that insightfull depth, that field of view is "inbuilt" and the very essence of that concept i try to get across, that some things are just hard wired in us, we understood it better when we was nomads i think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cos when it comes to all things arb Britain rules, simples, No? check the history!:001_tt2:

 

Yes we are impatient, because there is a MASSIVE void in the micro/niche habitat of the most diverse group of organisms in the woodland environment.

 

We made this happen, and its OUR responsibility to rectify the damage.

 

I fear for your trees. Do you believe you are the first with enthusiasm and heart who believes that they have finally found what is necessary to fix things? With the knowledge you possess at the moment, you would gladly press your cause with physical action. Where does this assurety come from?

 

You admire the woodsmen of old with their understanding of the world around them. Yet people then are as people now. To survive requires being clever. I could survive in the wilderness from the age of 10. I was clever.

 

However, with the help of time, I was able to understand you cannot rush time and you cannot teach wisdom.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fear for your trees. Do you believe you are the first with enthusiasm and heart who believes that they have finally found what is necessary to fix things? With the knowledge you possess at the moment, you would gladly press your cause with physical action. Where does this assurety come from?

 

You admire the woodsmen of old with their understanding of the world around them. Yet people then are as people now. To survive requires being clever. I could survive in the wilderness from the age of 10. I was clever.

 

However, with the help of time, I was able to understand you cannot rush time and you cannot teach wisdom.

 

Dave

 

and the point your making is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.