Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Chainsaw from MEWP?


Burytreeman
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a really good thread, thanks to all who did the research. I've been arguing this with clients for a while now - always with success - based on conversations with a couple of trainers, but its really good to see the replies from NPTC and HSE back this up.

 

Thanks again.:thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This thread is another good example of how this forum is extremely useful to anyone in the arb industry or getting in to the arb industry (myself) :)

thanks to all for researching it and getting the final answer, its answered a question that could save time and money :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is another good example of how this forum is extremely useful to anyone in the arb industry or getting in to the arb industry (myself) :)

thanks to all for researching it and getting the final answer, its answered a question that could save time and money :D

 

Happy days :thumbup: I know what its like having spent weeks going from pillar to post trying to find the answer, arbtalk rules :thumbup1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James, I'm happy to stand by my reply that holders of CS39 + MEWP ticket don't require CS47 as the correct answer. :001_smile:

 

Cheers..

Paul

You are technically correct Paul, but there is quite a bit more than tension and compression taught on a CS47 course.

 

There are very few similarities between using a saw from MEWP/harness, for instance 39 no mention of how and why attachment of saw to bucket, positioning in relation to cutting ETC,

 

Isn't it all about being trained to cope with the task at hand? Not sure where a person/employer would stand if there where an incident where he/she was not trained for the task at hand despite it not being a prerequisite.

 

Terry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has always been a grey area whilst risk assessing my own team.

 

Best practice is only a minimum requirement not a definitive one! Every employer must risk assess the tasks they are undertaking so as to minimise risk of harm?

 

I second your point Terry.

 

Issues I have had as an employer/supervisor:

 

IPAF/Lantra/C&G, do not cover;

 

Dropping material from a MEWP - in fact they dictate we must not.

Positioning the machine in relation to dropping material is not covered.

Methods of breaking off sections using ropes or by hand are not covered.

Where to put the machine when cutting is completed (how many people have you seen hand it over the side of the basket?)

The MEWP is more vulnerable to turning over should the saw get stuck in the curf cut.

 

I have had other issues I am sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.