Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
In the pipeline Tom, I was only talking about it today.

 

To get a true sight picture the camera has to be mounted ontop of the barrels, obviously obscuring the veiw.

 

I never look at the barrels when aiming the shotgun, so don't need a bead or anything and could still hit stuff.....but....a humongous lump ontop of the barrels is going to be hard work.

 

I've tried underneath and on the side but it just isn't right.

 

Will get everything sorted for next week or the week after. Next week is the shoot I captain on so don't really get chance to mess with cameras, will do it on the one the week after :top::2gunsfiring_v1:

 

 

Cool, are you a side by side man or over and under.

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'm not much good with a side by side, but i'm worse with an over and under. Used to drive the "beaters cart" on a local shoot and would have a bit of fun on the keepers day with a borrowed gun. I'd love to get one now but just like my fishing hobby i'd probably never find time to do it. Enjoy the season.:001_smile:

Posted
If the fox diddnt enjoy it, he wouldnt join in :001_smile:

 

HaHaHa!I,m not saying dont shoot the fox,after all if I had livestock and it was bothering them I would do the same.I am an F.A.C holder with various rifles from .22 to .308 and more than happy to kill for the pot. My point in all this is that using such photo,s does nothing for the image of hunting and conservation. Make sense?

Posted
Let me guess Dean, a 686?

 

Spot on.

 

My main gun which I shoot 90% of the time is a 686 20g and I also have a 687 silver pigeon III for heavy loads for those mega high Duck and Geese

 

But one day I will have myself a Beretta SO10 eell at a mere £50K.

 

Shall I start saving now :001_tongue:

Posted
HaHaHa!I,m not saying dont shoot the fox,after all if I had livestock and it was bothering them I would do the same.I am an F.A.C holder with various rifles from .22 to .308 and more than happy to kill for the pot. My point in all this is that using such photo,s does nothing for the image of hunting and conservation. Make sense?

 

 

agreed, theres no need to fuel the antis with added amunition, even though it is only a bit of light humour.

you gotta admit, that is a class pic tho, and its not exactly shoving it in the antis faces (which would be bloody good fun):001_tongue:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.