Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

tpo's work application - Deleted from system??


Joy Yeomans
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have put in planning for the lads to work on a very mature copper beech, we understood from initial telephone calls with council and owner it had a tpo on it, i submitted the necessary forms and the homeowner, not us as agents received an email today saying ;

 

lifted from home owners email

"

Further to the submission of the above application I would advise you that it has been deleted from our system. Consent is not required for the works to the tree as it is not covered by a Tree Preservation Order and is not within a Conservation Area."

UNQUOTE

 

What does deleted from our system mean?:confused1:, it had a tpo and theyve decided to take it off? I've never come across this before, the lads are still out, so i thought i'd ask the question to see what you guys think and why we as agents havent heard a dickie bird from council?

 

obviously i will give them a ring tomorrow for my self , but anyone come across this before?

 

oh and its on an english heritage listed monument area, if this has any bearing as well

 

joy

Edited by Joy Yeomans
addition
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

It could mean that a chainsaw wielding neighbour has been round and the tree isnt there anymore :001_tt2::lol:

 

 

whilst its in the scheduled ancient monument, this only effects underground work such as footings for buildings, no metal detecting etc on this site. Its a shame as the council did have the tpo's on their online mapping system but they seem to have removed that layer now so you have to contact them.

 

I assume the big sycamore that is maintained by G&T as part of English Heritages part of the site is a TPO as its had cable bracing etc installed when really its damaging the SAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:001_tt2:

It could mean that a chainsaw wielding neighbour has been round and the tree isnt there anymore

 

whilst its in the scheduled ancient monument, this only effects underground work such as footings for buildings, no metal detecting etc on this site. Its a shame as the council did have the tpo's on their online mapping system but they seem to have removed that layer now so you have to contact them.

 

I assume the big sycamore that is maintained by G&T as part of English Heritages part of the site is a TPO as its had cable bracing etc installed when really its damaging the SAM.

 

was still their this morning, so unless said neighbour winched it over with the landrover this afternoon im guessing its still in situ:001_tt2:

 

any how, dont know whats happening as owner now back peddling over if can spend on said tree:sneaky2: will be putting in a bill for application and sawing up of failed limb. - thats if the limb is still there in the morning and hasnt sneakily moved across the road to the logstore there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have put in planning for the lads to work on a very mature copper beech, we understood from initial telephone calls with council and owner it had a tpo on it, i submitted the necessary forms and the homeowner, not us as agents received an email today saying ;

 

lifted from home owners email

"

Further to the submission of the above application I would advise you that it has been deleted from our system. Consent is not required for the works to the tree as it is not covered by a Tree Preservation Order and is not within a Conservation Area."

UNQUOTE

What does deleted from our system mean?:confused1:, it had a tpo and theyve decided to take it off? I've never come across this before, the lads are still out, so i thought i'd ask the question to see what you guys think and why we as agents havent heard a dickie bird from council?

 

obviously i will give them a ring tomorrow for my self , but anyone come across this before?

 

oh and its on an english heritage listed monument area, if this has any bearing as well

 

joy

 

The tree was not TPO'd so they have deleted the "application" as its not needed, thats how it reads to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, I'd 2nd 'SKyhuck' presumption BUT would still double-check!

 

Cheers..

Paul

 

Hell no, it’s asleep, poking it with a stick is a bad idea.

 

You have a communication informing you that consent is not required and you are entitled to place reliance on such an unambiguous document, fell the tree bill the client and make firewood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.