Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

K-K-K-K-K-Kretzch


Matthew Arnold
 Share

Recommended Posts

This Lime had Kretzch, the TO had gone to the address to look a Horse chestnut and spotted it. The was very little die-back the crown, but it had snapped clean off at the base and was resting on the Sycamores behind.

 

The owner had not noticed.

IMG_3818.jpg.2de2961f2b9c250b7ba7186bcee665b6.jpg

IMG_3799.jpg.6e8c59aa6c540992079564bec9c1b6f5.jpg

IMG_3791.jpg.dd4b0aff94e1b80407b41dc70fdc475c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wasnt meaning to be an insulting comment:blushing:. Its just the select few in my area that make merry hell when we fell the smallest sapling. We were made the anti christ the other day for deadwooding an old Oak with a 20 mm rope and a van. Deadwooding and fracture pruning in one

 

lol, dont worry, he was being subtle!:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread. K. deusta is a bit of an arch-enemy for good reason. It's interesting to try to gauge the extent of decay in the tree based on the size/extent of sporophores, as it sometimes doesn't hold. Here's a report I did on a beech tree I did in a garden of a second home (so not much used). The fruiting bodies were pretty extensive, but the internal investigation was a bit surprising. I normally would have felled it, but as it is, I think we'll get at least another 3 years out of it (while replacements get away). Despite the pronounced drought here this spring, the crown looks much as it did last year.

59765b305c940_GlanyMenaiBeechsurvey.jpg.85d2c572382eb005e3015cdedaa01b3b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good thread. K. deusta is a bit of an arch-enemy for good reason. It's interesting to try to gauge the extent of decay in the tree based on the size/extent of sporophores, as it sometimes doesn't hold. Here's a report I did on a beech tree I did in a garden of a second home (so not much used). The fruiting bodies were pretty extensive, but the internal investigation was a bit surprising. I normally would have felled it, but as it is, I think we'll get at least another 3 years out of it (while replacements get away). Despite the pronounced drought here this spring, the crown looks much as it did last year.

 

 

Thats a good report, very informative. However, as k.deusta is a but rotter, would it not have shown a better perspective of the trees structural integrity by having the picus a lot lower, at 200mm or even 100mm from the base?

 

Ive seen a failed ash that had k. deusta all in the base, and a picus at 800mm wouldnt have picked up anything to condemn the tree, but one at 300mm would have had it down yesterday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are a few images from the Hornbeam. Again the tree looked fine from the outside, but knowing about Kretch we knew otherwise. We took the majority down with our Cherry picker then felled. Needless to say it didnt behave itself during felling!!

IMG_0911.jpg.5ab0c0d68f5e9ecf460ad3f37856dd23.jpg

IMG_0910.jpg.988069227dd91f1a592f07aa9d04a6c8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, as k.deusta is a but rotter, would it not have shown a better perspective of the trees structural integrity by having the picus a lot lower, at 200mm or even 100mm from the base?

 

Or even as low as at or below ground level. The mycelium of a soft rotter like K. deusta often attacks the root plate and buttresses from below, going upward in the center of the trunk and then spreading out radially until the cambium is reached and its parasitical phase starts, after which the foliage becomes transparent and outer parts and/or the top of the crown die. With beech, hornbeam (see above photo) and lime, the appearance of fruiting with black crusts often indicates the mycelium has done its detrimental work of total decay inside and especially trees, which are still in full foliage can become vulnerable for windthrow.

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't get lower with the Picus due to slope and obstructions, but i did take some Resistograph readings at ground level with corroborated the Picus findings that the extent of the decay decreased the lower I went. When a report is for a homeowner, unless the Resistograph readings contradict (as they sometimes do), thew Picus readings then I don't include them. Picus readings are are fairly intuitive for a non-expert to undertsand, but it's more difficult (in my experience) to explain Resisto readings.

 

There's no question that this tree will need to be felled in due course, I simply judged that given the tree is in a very low-use area, felling would have been premature given the readings. I might Picus it again this year and compare the findings...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.