Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

To Mulch, or not to Mulch?


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ayo!!!

 

Veteran oak, feature tree on a common, dbh 154cm, much amenity and bio value, although compaction to much of rooting area caused by car parking. Car parking area is covered in type1 or similar. There is money available to airspade although I think the money could be spent wiser. How would be best to remove the layer of scalps? I'm guessing by hand with spades. I would prefer to scrape surface and lay a decent layer of mulch and spend available money on shifting the carparking spaces along 10 metres. I'm not convinced that airspading won't blast away fibrous rooting and cause accelerated decline. Perhaps it could be something to be tried if positive results aren't demonstrated with decent mulching after 4-5 years?

 

Apologies about the single paragraph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

Decompaction of the soil is just as important, if not more than, mulching, as this allows the roots to respire, it allows better uptake of water, trace elements and nutrients, also at this time of year, the roots will be actively growing to store energy for winter, so any minor damages with an airspade will be rectified by the tree as it produces new roots, whilst mycorrhizal fungi will help reclaim the nutrients from the lost root fibre

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David, when you say micorrhizal are you saying youve located nodes? or fruiting bodies? was I mistaken in thinking Pear is endo or maybe ectendro (undetermined )

 

what cropped up out of interest:001_smile:

 

What certainly looked like nodes Tony (no images)

Obviously I can't confirm that they were specifically on the pear roots.

There are other tree genus in the immediate locality.

 

'The' list suggests (as you point out) that Pyrus has endomycorrhizal association. So without further reference, I would lean toward that particular data unless there are other reference stating ectendro ?

 

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I've never gotten past the variability in penetrometer readings due to moisture content, so I just go by feel with a steel probe sans gauge. I do measure exactly 170# laying on it, so there's some scientific consistency of a sort. :001_rolleyes:

 

But re internodal cuts, I blew that pic up to 350% and for the life of me it looks like all the cuts were to buds, growth points with laterals or where previous laterals have shed, aka nodal cuts. So which ones were internodal? Or is this my yank dialect confusing me again? :confused1:

 

 

Pretty looking tree regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.