Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Afternoon all 

 

I was wondering if anyone has monitored lime with kretz (I’d also be interested in other trees) and not taken remedial action, but then gone on to observe the tree to failure (or not). I’d be interested in the timescales involved, extent of decay, suspected or measured, form of the tree, type of location, the event that caused failure, all the nitty gritty. 
 

In lower risk areas have people any successful experience of progressive works, ie not just felling or reducing down to wildlife habitat? 
 

I have just surveyed a lime of 127cm dbh and 4m circumference. It has a small cavity in between buttresses that indicates 1m of decay within. The hammer indicated some obvious decay in one of the buttresses (near the kretz). The fruiting bodies are located on the tensionwood side and extend for approximately 1m up the stem.
 

The tree is multi stemmed and has a heavy stem on the opposing side from the kretz. The stem overhangs gravestones and a minor path in a large cemetery. 

 

I would imagine the path is used no more than a couple of times a day and potentially occasionally by grounds maintenance staff for strimming etc. The cemetery is open about 12hrs a day in summer and 8hrs a day in winter. So occupancy levels are very low. 
 

The tree is of good vigour, not showing much epicormic growth and benefits from companion shelter. 
 

My current thoughts are that decay is obviously extensive and action should be taken to prevent damage to the gravestones, even if injury to a person is minimal. 
 

The tree is of some age/ size, particularly for an urban tree and I am keen to balance the duty of care with any possible preservation of the tree. I am sure someone is going suggest more detailed decay detection equipment. If you think that is the right course of action then I open to hearing it, but if you could entertain some potential theoretical as well that would be appreciated.
 

I am trying to build my experience of kretz by looking at failed trees, the stumps of condemned trees and colonised standing trees, although am conscious about falling into assumptions based on limited early career experience. 
 

Thank you 

 

Christian 

 

IMG_7252.jpeg

IMG_7250.jpeg

IMG_7246.jpeg

IMG_7243.jpeg

IMG_7240.jpeg

IMG_7242.jpeg

IMG_7241.jpeg

IMG_7251.jpeg

IMG_7245.jpeg

IMG_7244.jpeg

IMG_7253.jpeg

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I was asked to chop up a lime stump, around 36" DBH.

Screenshot_2025-04-26-22-44-30-018_com.google.android_apps_maps.thumb.jpg.65f3d04a1b7a54f0e32818144dd7d0a5.jpg

It fell in December. The roots were powder and significantly sized logs weighed nothing. The owners were unaware of its ill health until it fell in a storm.

 

IMG_20250426_175203.thumb.jpg.54c9080686b72a0b0c93636265de6849.jpg

 

 

Quote

There is no designated treatment for K. deusta once it has infected its host. Once established, the infection is terminal for the tree. It can result in sudden breakage in otherwise apparently healthy trees, with visually healthy crowns. This can result in hazardous trees in public settings near roadways, trails, or buildings. Therefore, the recommended treatment would be to fell trees in areas that may be hazardous and to avoid using the infected plant material as mulch.

 

 

My opinion is to remove.

Posted (edited)

Pete, what you’ve said is my current outlook. I just wanted to sound people out on whether there were ever alternatives. Not only in reference to this tree, but other trees with kretz at significantly earlier stages of decay. 

Edited by CTTree
  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, kram said:

I was asked to chop up a lime stump, around 36" DBH.

Screenshot_2025-04-26-22-44-30-018_com.google.android_apps_maps.thumb.jpg.65f3d04a1b7a54f0e32818144dd7d0a5.jpg

It fell in December. The roots were powder and significantly sized logs weighed nothing. The owners were unaware of its ill health until it fell in a storm.

 

IMG_20250426_175203.thumb.jpg.54c9080686b72a0b0c93636265de6849.jpg

 

 

 

 

My opinion is to remove.


Thank you. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.