Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes except I’m not a tyre kicker. If I was offering £64.18 for something, I was wanting to do the deal for £64.18, not just talk about VAT with them. Got the deal 10-20% of the time. Got an interested response to the maths 20-30% of the time. Got an angry response to the maths 60-70% of the time. The remaining 10% of the time I was talking to someone like Mick, the assiduously disinterested. 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)

Working example. GRCS with a visor, new from Honeys website £3293 excluding VAT (£3952 including VAT). Removing the 30% retail margin gives £2533. Then adjust for condition:

20% (very poor) - pay £506

40% (slightly poor) - pay £1013

60% (fair) - pay £1520

80% (good) - pay £2026

100% (perfect) - pay £2533

 

So that GRCS that Mick saw advertised for £2500 would have had to be in 99% condition to be worth the asking price. His appraisal that £2000 was a fair price would put the condition at 79% (which it roughly was). Perhaps he uses the same calculation I do.

Edited by AHPP
Posted
6 hours ago, AHPP said:

Yes except I’m not a tyre kicker. If I was offering £64.18 for something, I was wanting to do the deal for £64.18, not just talk about VAT with them. Got the deal 10-20% of the time. Got an interested response to the maths 20-30% of the time. Got an angry response to the maths 60-70% of the time. The remaining 10% of the time I was talking to someone like Mick, the assiduously disinterested. 

“Assiduously disinterested”!
I literally bought a Hobbs off you!

Posted

Well, in fairness it was £800 which was a good price.

 

I never saw it though, it was stored at my nephew’s, who lives oop north.
 He is a climber, he took a shine to it and paid me what I paid Alex.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Mick Dempsey said:

“Assiduously disinterested”!
I literally bought a Hobbs off you!


I of course refer to your very apparent general contempt for the theoretical, ideological or even the very modestly circuitous. You would not have been remotely interested to hear the reason for charging £787. 16 instead. You don’t care about that sort of funny bollocks. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.