Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Oak Butt


Jaarkeal
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Jaarkeal said:

Will this still be OK to mill even though there is a great big crack through the centre? I have the split horizontal with the ground but I didn't want to ruin this as its 150cm diameter.

Not sure what others think about about turning the log so that the crack is vertical and at 90 degrees to the horizontal saw cuts? It wouldn't be possible to have full width slabs, but it should minimise waste and slabs half the width of that log will still be very heavy and difficult to move about. I'd be worried about the crack following the grain which might undulate or spiral along the log length so although a saw cut might start at one end in line with the crack, further along the crack may be inclined and move into adjacent boards causing a fair bit of waste as they will be varying thickness at the crack.

 

Andrew

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

It's certainly worth milling. Assuming the crack is orientated in the same plane on both ends, mill it so that the crack is 90 degrees to the cut. The boards might split along the centre, but full width boards are overrated anyway. 2-2.5ft wide is plenty.

Edited by Big J
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big J said:

It's certainly worth milling. Assuming the crack is orientated in the lane plan on both ends, mill it so that the crack is 90 degrees to the cut. The boards might split along the centre, but full width boards are overrated anyway. 2-2.5ft wide is plenty.

as john said....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ucoulddoit said:

Not sure what others think about about turning the log so that the crack is vertical and at 90 degrees to the horizontal saw cuts? It wouldn't be possible to have full width slabs, but it should minimise waste and slabs half the width of that log will still be very heavy and difficult to move about. I'd be worried about the crack following the grain which might undulate or spiral along the log length so although a saw cut might start at one end in line with the crack, further along the crack may be inclined and move into adjacent boards causing a fair bit of waste as they will be varying thickness at the crack.

 

Andrew

would that be construed as   crack creep?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I were asked to mill this log I would recommend splitting in half down heart crack, then split again into quarters, thereby keeping all the possible issues with iron in one quarter, to later mill into larger sections( thereby reducing the chances of hitting metal), the remaining 3/4 to be mill into nice stable clean QS boards, with any heart faults to one side of the board which will be of managable sizes to move by hand. 

For example , photo below is ms880 c/w 48" bar

WP_20160826_14_54_42_Pro.jpg

WP_20160826_09_56_39_Pro.jpg

WP_20160826_14_54_55_Pro.jpg

WP_20160923_10_51_28_Pro.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly worth milling. Assuming the crack is orientated in the same plane on both ends, mill it so that the crack is 90 degrees to the cut. The boards might split along the centre, but full width boards are overrated anyway. 2-2.5ft wide is plenty.

Depends on what you sell.
I have a hard time trying to explain qs to woodworkers.
They mostly want 3' wide with two live edges.
If the crack is horizontal at both ends I'd mill it full size.
If it's got a twisted crack, I'd not bother milling it, as even with qs you end up with a lot of firewood.
Or mill it and fill it with resin.
[emoji106]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, youcallthatbig said:

if I were asked to mill this log I would recommend splitting in half down heart crack, then split again into quarters, thereby keeping all the possible issues with iron in one quarter, to later mill into larger sections( thereby reducing the chances of hitting metal), the remaining 3/4 to be mill into nice stable clean QS boards, with any heart faults to one side of the board which will be of managable sizes to move by hand. 

For example , photo below is ms880 c/w 48" bar

WP_20160826_14_54_42_Pro.jpg

WP_20160826_09_56_39_Pro.jpg

WP_20160826_14_54_55_Pro.jpg

WP_20160923_10_51_28_Pro.jpg

That is on helluva saw but still not big enough to cut through the five foot butt in question in one go

The Lucas slabber is five foot.

If it was mine I would  circular swing saw boards out of the top quarter until I could see what it was like and slab it if appropriate and maybe have the flexibility of going back to swing sawing as necessary on the next level as I worked my way down avoiding the crack.

But  I agree with Big J in that a five foot wide three inch thick slab is a hefty thing to deal with or make anything of without cutting it down a bit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.